Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,920   Posts: 1,584,813   Online: 1086
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,576
    Images
    27

    David Muench - B&W images

    Has anyone else seen the B&W work by David Muench that is in the current issue of View Camera? Have admired his work for some time, but was unaware of any B&W work and must say, I would love to see some in person.

    If you haven't seen the work, pick up a copy..it's is worth it - IMHO..
    Mike C

    Rambles

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    829
    Images
    7
    I agree. The opening shot with the low sun and large boulders is fantastic. Some of his photos appear to be too dark for my tastes though. I'm sure they're better in hand.

    The current issue of VC is, IMO, one of the best to date. Maybe it's just because most of the content is of interest to me. Regardless, kudos to Simmons for this issue.

  3. #3
    scootermm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    1,868
    Images
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by matt miller
    The current issue of VC is, IMO, one of the best to date. Maybe it's just because most of the content is of interest to me. Regardless, kudos to Simmons for this issue.
    I have to fully agree with this.
    truly is a great issue. I love the Ikebana article especially. Im not a still life photographer in the least bit but these images and the article are wonderful.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Norwich, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,405
    Images
    90
    I agree that this is one of the best from a portfolio perspective. The standard is excellent.

    I would be interested to here Sand Kings response tothe Pyrocat-PMK comparison. Any comments Sandy?

    Plus I would love a 5x4 version of the cooke triple lens

    Phill
    It is not tradition that secures the survival of our craft, its the craft that secures the survival of our traditions.

  5. #5
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by photomc
    Has anyone else seen the B&W work by David Muench that is in the current issue of View Camera? Have admired his work for some time, but was unaware of any B&W work and must say, I would love to see some in person.

    If you haven't seen the work, pick up a copy..it's is worth it - IMHO..
    Unfortunately, I am still waiting on it to hit the bookstores. Just checked Barnes and Nobles yesterday, they still have the last issue. But, I am excited with all I hear about it.
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  6. #6
    mobtown_4x5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    244
    Quote Originally Posted by philldresser

    Plus I would love a 5x4 version of the cooke triple lens

    Phill
    YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

    anyone want to start an e-mail/letter/petition campaign?

    How about picketing, sit-ins...

    Matt

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963
    It's ironic. I've been trying to pare down the number of magazines I subscribe to. I decided that View Camera was one I could let go. Ex of the Color portfolios, everything seemed to be duplicated someplace else, or was survey info easily availble through google. Then this porfolio laden issue comes along and it was so good that i had to buy it.

    I read Gordon Hutchings review of the Cooke convertable and I couldn't help thinking that it was a little too glowing. I find it hard to believe that a convertable lens, down to a single element can match the performance of a modern optic, yet that's what Gordon seems to be implying. A simple comparison under a 10x magnifier of a Cooke negative vs. the same pic taken with an apo-symmar doesn't seem that difficult to do.

    The PMK vs. Pyrocat was actually good in that there was a detailed comparison, within the limits of published pictures. Again it misses mentioning that Pryocat works in a Jobo and PMK doesn't.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Norwich, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,405
    Images
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Duffy
    The PMK vs. Pyrocat was actually good in that there was a detailed comparison, within the limits of published pictures. Again it misses mentioning that Pryocat works in a Jobo and PMK doesn't.
    Personally I don't think this was a completely fair or detailed comparison. In fact I thought it was particulary biased to PMK. I also thought it strange that no mention was made of Pyrocat-HD's founder, Sandy King or that some fairly serious articles/studies have been published on this developer.

    It seemed to me the that the exposure was determined for a polaroid 55 and then replicated at the known ISO for a PMK neg, expecting Pyrocat to have the same characteristics. Proof that it hasn't is that the shadow detail was reduced. So, give it more exposure i.e change the film speed. It is documented well that Pyrocat retains film speed. The results that Steve S got could be attributed to slight under exposure and therefore being represented further down the curve. I might be wrong of course but thats how I see it.

    Please someone tell me if this is wrong

    However, the rest of the mag was top dollar.

    Phill
    It is not tradition that secures the survival of our craft, its the craft that secures the survival of our traditions.

  9. #9
    roy
    roy is offline
    roy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    West Sussex
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,306
    [QUOTE=philldresser]Personally I don't think this was a detailed comparison

    It was the sort of report that would reassure anyone thinking that they might give Pyrocat a trial, not to bother and stick with PMK.
    Roy Groombridge.

    Cogito, ergo sum.
    (Descartes)

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central Texas
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    67
    "I read Gordon Hutchings review of the Cooke convertable and I couldn't help thinking that it was a little too glowing. I find it hard to believe that a convertable lens, down to a single element can match the performance of a modern optic, yet that's what Gordon seems to be implying. A simple comparison under a 10x magnifier of a Cooke negative vs. the same pic taken with an apo-symmar doesn't seem that difficult to do."

    Hey Tom, It isn't really all that hard to believe that the lens can perform well with just one lens cell. The front and rear cells are each made up of four Elements separated by a very specific air space--so specific that you could almost consider it as a fifth element--sorta like in the movie! So each cell has as many elements as a tessar, which obviously perform quite well with only four elements.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin