From The New York Times

[Steve Smith]

If I was the judge in this case I'd rule that the complainant should pay the defendants legal costs of $50,000

If I was the defendant in this case, I don't think I would spend £1 (or $1) defending it. I don't see how it has got to $50,000. It shouldn't have even got to court.


Steve.

[c6h6o3]

If I was the defendant in this case, I don't think I would spend £1 (or $1) defending it. I don't see how it has got to $50,000. It shouldn't have even got to court.


Steve.

If you don't defend you lose by default.

[Steve Smith]

If you don't defend you lose by default.

I would defend.... I just wouldn't spend any money doing it.


Steve.

[cowanw]

I doubt you are likely to collect money from the unemployed

"If I was the judge in this case I'd rule that the complainant should pay the defendants legal costs of $50,000, pay them $ 100,000 compensation for their pain and suffering, and the two divorcees be ordered by the court to re-create their wedding night"

[rthomas]

There were some photos from my first wedding that I was less-than-thrilled with (I'm on marriage number two now, this one seems like it's going to work). But, seeing as how that marriage is over, the *last* thing I want to do is recreate the event. Yikes! I surely don't wish to have a visit with the ex-mother-in-law.

The word "warped" simply leaps to mind here!

[mrred]

And I wonder why the ex does not want to be found......

[ic-racer]

I suspect some hidden agenda of the plaintiff.