Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,218   Posts: 1,532,219   Online: 871
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Viewing light

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,156

    Viewing light

    Are there any objective values provided for the intensity of the light one uses to view prints when such prints are just out of the fixer? Obviously both the intensity AND the spectrum of the viewing light can influence the final print. Hence I wonder if there are any EV or reflected light values advised for the light one uses to judge prints.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    ROL
    ROL is offline
    ROL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    794
    Evaluation light only need be equivalent (intensity and qualitatively) to that used for print display. Personal experience with your own lab conditions count for a lot.

  3. #3
    Maris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Noosa, Queensland, Australia.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    723
    I use two viewing lights for assessing wet photographs just out of the fixer.

    The first light is dim and it is used to judge the tonal balance only, not detail or sharpness. The intensity of this light is adjusted way down so that wet photographs in the darkroom match dry photographs in ordinary room light. This compensates for the dry-down phenomenon. If the "tonal viewing" light is too bright all the photographs will turn out too dark when they finally dry.

    The other viewing light is very bright and is used to judge sharpness, defects, etc. It takes some mental discipline to reject the luminous beauties of a wet photograph under a bright light and accept dry-down will happen.
    Photography, the word itself, invented and defined by its author Sir John.F.W.Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society, Somerset House, London. Quote "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..". unquote.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,156
    Yes, I am very much aware of the Bruce Barnbaum approach to gradually increasing the intensity of the light Maris. Thanks.

    So, do you calibrate your viewing light so as to be sure that it isn't too bright OR too dark?

  5. #5
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,240
    Images
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by Mahler_one View Post
    Are there any objective values provided for the intensity of the light one uses to view prints when such prints are just out of the fixer? Obviously both the intensity AND the spectrum of the viewing light can influence the final print. Hence I wonder if there are any EV or reflected light values advised for the light one uses to judge prints.

    Thanks.
    Ralph Lambrecht and Chris Woodhouse include a recommendation in "Way Beyond Monochrome".

    I'll try to locate it for you (I have edition 1).

    EDIT - I have it - on page 241 Ralph indicates that he uses two 100 Watt incandescent bulbs adjusted to illuminate a "viewing board" to about EV 6 at ISO 100, as neasured by an incident meter.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  6. #6
    David Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    392
    The best approach is not to judge prints when wet. I use an old microwave to dry my test prints and then assess them with the main darkroom strip light on, and then in the corridor which is somewhat dimmer.

    If I am printing for an exhibition in a gallery, I try to meter the average light and then set up a viewing board illuminated to similar value.

    For sales to people who are buying prints to hang on the wall, it is always best to view the prints with a 60 watt bulb placed 8 feet away as most people have somewhat dim lighting in their homes.

    Best,

    David
    www.dsallen.de

  7. #7
    jp80874's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bath, OH 44210 USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,409
    Images
    6
    I have a sample print with full tonal range that looks good where I plan to show it, that I hang over the sink. I can’t equal the light in the darkroom where I will show the print, but the sample print helps me adjust my eyes and expectations. I have to mentally adjust for the roughly 10% dry down.

    John Powers
    "If you want to be famous, you must do something more badly than anybody in the entire world." Miroslav Tichý

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    1,156
    PERFECT! Thanks to David and jp as well.

    I have been using one of the Solux bulbs to evaluate the print. The bulb has the "correct" spectrum to evaluate a black and white print. However, since my darkroom is so small, the intensity of the light has to be decreased. I was looking for an EV value that one might use as a starting point. Good suggestions all.

    The resources at APUG and the willingness of others to help, makes being a member of the group very worth while.

  9. #9
    Maris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Noosa, Queensland, Australia.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    723
    Quote Originally Posted by Mahler_one View Post
    PERFECT! Thanks to David and jp as well.

    I have been using one of the Solux bulbs to evaluate the print. The bulb has the "correct" spectrum to evaluate a black and white print. However, since my darkroom is so small, the intensity of the light has to be decreased. I was looking for an EV value that one might use as a starting point. Good suggestions all.

    The resources at APUG and the willingness of others to help, makes being a member of the group very worth while.
    For the record, I measured my wet photograph "tonal evaluation" light as providing 10 Lux at the fixer tray. The light over the work/display bench outside the darkroom delivers 390 Lux. The difference is enough for me to preview the effect of dry-down.

    As others point out all this careful adjustment is confounded by how the photographs are subsequently displayed. Some galleries use a dim 50 Lux of yellowish light in the mistaken belief that photographs will fade like old master drawings. The local camera club uses 850 Lux so that grain sniffers get a good look. You do your best but you can't win.
    Photography, the word itself, invented and defined by its author Sir John.F.W.Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society, Somerset House, London. Quote "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..". unquote.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin