Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,592   Posts: 1,545,968   Online: 1262
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    ColdEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    714
    Images
    47

    Help me out on these contact prints

    I have decided to do contact prints of a bunch of my negatives, I started with the 4x5s and they printed out nicely. But when I was printing some of my earlier negatives (which scanned really nicely), It seems that the contact prints are really dark, and some are almost black. I contact print using a 7w bulb, suspended about 3 feet above the paper and negatives and exposure times are around 15-20secs. Do I need to increase exposure times to get a usable pictures out of the "thin" negatives? Thanks

    Ranie
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scan-120917-0001.jpg   Scan-120917-0002.jpg   Scan-120917-0003.jpg  

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,032
    Quote Originally Posted by ColdEye View Post
    I Do I need to increase exposure times to get a usable pictures out of the "thin" negatives?
    You need to DECREASE the exposure time for your thin negatives.

  3. #3
    ROL
    ROL is offline
    ROL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    794
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof_Pixel View Post
    You need to DECREASE the exposure time for your thin negatives.
    ...and you can accomplish this simply on the same contact sheet by exposing for the thin ones, covering them up, and adding exposure to the denser ones.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    local
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,358
    Blog Entries
    6
    Images
    52
    hi

    why don't you separate the thin from the dense
    and contact print the dense ones together, they look like around the same exposures
    and the thin ones together as well.
    much easier than burning and dodging out your contact sheets ...
    silver magnets, trickle tanks sold
    artwork often times sold for charity
    PM me for details

  5. #5
    ParkerSmithPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    814
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by ColdEye View Post
    Do I need to increase exposure times to get a usable pictures out of the "thin" negatives?
    Thin negs can scan surprisingly well. They are in many ways preferable to denser negs (for scanning, not printing).

    For contact sheets, I keep a small collection of black foam core in 2.25" wide strips and squares. If I have negs like yours where the lighting varies, I just place the strips/squares on top of the negs that need dodging and then add time for the other negs. It's pretty easy and intuitive. Definitely worth it to have balanced contact sheets when reviewing negatives months or years later.
    Parker Smith Photography, Inc.
    Atlanta, GA

    Commercial & Fine Art Photography
    Portrait Photography

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,032
    Quote Originally Posted by ParkerSmithPhoto View Post
    Thin negs can scan surprisingly well. They are in many ways preferable to denser negs (for scanning, not printing).
    There is something called the Q factor (for scattering) that affects scanning; dye images are no problem but the more silver, the more scattering. That's why lower density negs scan better.


    Obviously, we are talking here in the context of scanning negs for use in the APUG photo gallery.

  7. #7
    ColdEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    714
    Images
    47
    Thank you for the replies. I don't know why but I was thinking that if the negatives were thin it needed more exposure time. Guess I will just rearrange the negatives (group the dense ones and the thin ones) or maybe print them into strips as most of them are 6x6. Thanks to all.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,070
    Maybe you should work on exposure control to get them a little closer to being the same? The exposure looks to be all over the place.

  9. #9
    ColdEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    714
    Images
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianShaw View Post
    Maybe you should work on exposure control to get them a little closer to being the same? The exposure looks to be all over the place.

    Yup, specially the first and last one, which were negatives when I was starting out. I had no idea about filter factors, development technique, metering technique, reciprocity etc... I looked fine when scanned but I guess it's a lot different when printing. As for exposure during printing, I use a timer.

  10. #10
    ColdEye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    714
    Images
    47
    A small update, looks like my exposure times are too long, got a bit better results with exposure times of 5-8 seconds. But I still have a long way to go.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Scan-120924-0005 (Large).jpg   Scan-120924-0009 (Large).jpg   Scan-120924-0001 (Large).jpg  

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin