Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,300   Posts: 1,535,825   Online: 794
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,013

    View Camera Magazine & David Muench ???

    What's the connection?

    OK...let me back up a little bit...I'm relatively new to VC mag. My first encounter was with the July/August 2004 issue. That issue and each of the three following issues has had a feature with David Muench...but no explanation why this artist's work gets recurring attention. I'm thinking maybe everybody already knows and I'm the only one dumb enough to wonder about it....

    Anyway, I like the mag. I savor the ads and photos for weeeks and have even patronized some of the advertisers. Favorite spreads were: Steven Shore (Jul/Aug 2004), David Burnett and Timothy Greenfield-Sanders (both Sept/Oct 2004)....but can somebody please give up the (secret?) connection ?

    Thanks,

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    463
    Images
    6
    David Muench is always welcome to View Camera in my estimation. He is the finest LF color nature photographer working today. He is also a fine person & very knowledgeable on his subject matter as well as how to photograph it.

    Hope Steve has him as a regular feature with an image or three & some information on the images/techniques used to create them.

  3. #3
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,034
    Images
    30
    well one thing is that David Muench lives in the same town as the magazine, Corralles New Mexico.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Floriduh
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,266
    Images
    2
    David and Mark both are great imagers. Interesting to find how invested they are in digital on the back end, but I guess it's to be expected at their level.

    Did you read the article on film availability and the reference by Kodak that film sales were leveling off after what had been a continuous decline. They attribute it to the pro's returning to the use of film for particular work.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,410
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by waynecrider
    .... Interesting to find how invested they are in digital on the back end, but I guess it's to be expected at their level...
    Oh I dunno - not necessarily.
    Jack Dykinga doesn't seem to rate digital backs on LF equipment very highly. (I personally would regard him to be at a similiar level and he is in the same field of photography).
    To paraphrase: "I still believe a single sheet of 4x5 film with an ability to capture 1.5 Gb of info is tough to beat - and you don't need an extra 2 people to carry the hundred pounds of equipment."

    I find myself agreeing with him for LF work. The practical efficiency, cost effectiveness and simple performance of film over digital backs makes better sense at this time (imho).
    Can't see it changing either. The users of LF equipment are a rather specialist and limited market that is bound to keep the costs of digital equipment high.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,512
    Images
    4
    I have not seen this issue yet, but I bet there is a slot canyon image somewhere. Evry issue has to have the obigatory slot canyon shot.
    "Fundamentally I think we need to rediscover a non-ironic world"
    Robert Adams

  7. #7
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,013
    I should perhaps clarify: David Muench's work is very good and I do enjoy it...was just wondering why he is favored. Guess the home town connection is the thing.

    Thanks everybody who responded.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1

    David Muench

    I do like David's style and dedication to photography, but I am very disappointed with his gallery prints in his Jackson Hole gallery. Most of them are ink jets including all of his black and whites prints. Some of the prints are on Fuji Crystal Archive and they do seem to look accurate. He gave his son Mark the responsibility to print the inkjets at their California location. Some of the prints do look digital and what is most disturbing, David Muench and his gallery partner David Brookover don't bother to put a real signature on their prints. They are digitally signed. There are some that are obliviously signed by a real person, but the signatures don't match, I guess those are probably signed by Mark.

    I guess it would be too inconvenient for them to be signed by the artist.

    And they call it Fine Art Photography.

    What a joke

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Northern suburb of Atlanta, GA USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    113
    Images
    1
    Perhaps you could inquire at the ViewCamera.com forums. I'm sure SS would appreciate the feedback and traffic to his forums.
    Eric
    www.esearing.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,236
    Images
    9
    Muench's work is one I have never tired of looking at. His converted BW images look terrible but aside from that the man is amazing. Dykinga is good but I do not see him on the same level. Both seem to have the power to stop the wind just when they want to.

    I stopped buying VC magazine because the articles did not interest me. Is Muench writing articles for them or is it just pictures? I would buy it if he was writing.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin