I have to say I do like this months magazine, mainly because it has articles about photographers I rate and some of their photographs such as Trevor Crone, alothough if I was picky the article could be longer with more photos!
Cheers, Lol
Hi Lol,
The original article was a bit longer plus I submitted quite a few prints. However I'm sure you can appreciate David and his team have quite a 'balancing' act to perform to keep each issue as varied as possible so something has to give. I was very pleased that one of the images was produced large rather then having a few more smaller images.
The original article was a bit longer plus I submitted quite a few prints. However I'm sure you can appreciate David and his team have quite a 'balancing' act to perform to keep each issue as varied as possible so something has to give. I was very pleased that one of the images was produced large rather then having a few more smaller images.
Regards,
Trevor.
Hi Trevor, yeah I can appreciate the balancing act but I was so damned pleased with your piece and the article (mainly the photographs taken with) on re-hashing old camera's I got all giddy. BTW I think I once saw a print of yours in a mag titled "Croydon". Anywhere I can see this larger on-line?
Lol, I'll try and get some of my more urban landscapes on the Arena site sometime and I'll include the Croydon pic you refered to, it's been one of my favourite shots that I've taken of Croydon's landscape.
Anyone any idea what happened to the clean subscribers cover this month. Was it cock up or conspiricy.
As an aside I thought the cover looked too much like an AP tabloid type publication rather than the broadsheet serious publication of the past.
Regards Paul.
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG
have the option to remove this ad.)
Anyone any idea what happened to the clean subscribers cover this month. Was it cock up or conspiricy.
As an aside I thought the cover looked too much like an AP tabloid type publication rather than the broadsheet serious publication of the past.
Regards Paul.
Damn, I was hoping that mine was an isolated cock up. Could be they're saving money, but the absence of the trashy text all over the cover photo was one of the benefits of subscription, IMO. Shame they didn't feel fit to mention a change in policy though...
It's a complete cock up... subscribers will be receiving the correct issue in due course. Can all subscribers please email SueB@thegmcgroup.com to let her know who you are and where you live so she can do another mailing... Thanks
David,
I too received a copy with printing on the cover, but rather than waste a couple of trees for a re-print will 'You' assume people who don't request one don't want one, or will you just send one out anyway?
David,
I too received a copy with printing on the cover, but rather than waste a couple of trees for a re-print will 'You' assume people who don't request one don't want one, or will you just send one out anyway?
I'm with Mark on this one. The cover is a pest, but that's really not a big deal on one issue and I wouldn't want a reprinted one.
If you wanted to send me your MP instead ............................
Linear Mode
