Discussions: 45,162 | Messages: 609,019 | Members: 29,921 | Online: 318 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1109 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
638 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
954 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Book, Magazine, Gallery Reviews & Shows > NY Times story on women war photographer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2007, 07:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Rob Skeoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default NY Times story on women war photographer

I found this interesting... you might too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/22/ar...=1&oref=slogin
__________________
Rob Skeoch
www.bigcameraworkshops.com
Rob Skeoch is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2007, 07:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
 
Mick Fagan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,869
Default

Yes that is very interesting, especially the slide show.

One of the pictures really is different not because it shows her and a soldier at the front line, but their footwear.

Did you notice their footwear?

It looks like they are wearing a slip on type of very light shoe. I wonder if this is because of heat because of summer, or if they just didn't have decent footwear and these were made up on the spot.

I wonder if there are any people on the forum of Spanish origin or nationality, who could possibly shed some light on this?

Mick.
Mick Fagan is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2007, 07:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,351
Default

Excellent - Thanks for the link Rob
__________________
Mike C
website
Rambles
photomc is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2007, 07:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
David H. Bebbington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Skeoch View Post
I found this interesting... you might too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/22/ar...=1&oref=slogin
Good to be reminded of a virtually forgotten photographer.

Another photographer in the same vein (female combat photographer, killed in action, almost forgotten today) was Dickey Chapelle.
David H. Bebbington is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2007, 11:08 AM   #5 (permalink)
 
Rolleiflexible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 936
Default

I'm attending the Patrons' preview tonight at ICP.
One must support those gallant Rolleiflex shooters.
Rolleiflexible is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 09-25-2007, 02:16 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,071
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolleiflexible View Post
I'm attending the Patrons' preview tonight at ICP.
One must support those gallant Rolleiflex shooters.
I can't make it tonight, but I'm a Rolleiflex-shooter building the Bank of America high-rise looming over the ICP.
Terence is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-25-2007, 10:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Dorothy Blum Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Carolina via Louisiana
Posts: 316
Default

I'm glad you shared the story.
Dorothy Blum Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using