Discussions: 45,237 | Messages: 609,922 | Members: 29,967 | Online: 372 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
SL66
Author: jmcd
21 view(s)
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1145 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
663 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
972 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Book, Magazine, Gallery Reviews & Shows > Terrific Show at Baltimore Museum of Art

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2008, 11:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,987
Default Terrific Show at Baltimore Museum of Art

"Looking Through the Lens: Photography 1900-1960" is at the Baltimore Museum of Art through June 8.

Overall I thought the show lacked focus. There was a lot of the usual stuff you'd expect to see in such a survey exhibition (some Adams, Margaret Bourke-White, Brassai, Atget all pretty uninspiring and some absolutely dreadful Paul Outerbridge prints) but there are some gems in this show which just about brought tears to my eyes. You just have to swim through a lot of chaff to get to the kernels of good stuff.

There were some fine Edward Weston prints (and some not so fine) but the highlight of the show for me was the Frederick Sommer cameraless abstract and the Aaron Siskind print next to it. Also, a unique collaboration between Horst and Salvador Dali, exquisitely printed.

If you're in the area it's certainly worth a few hours of your time.
c6h6o3 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using