Discussions: 45,235 | Messages: 609,910 | Members: 29,967 | Online: 395 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
SL66
Author: jmcd
15 view(s)
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1145 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
663 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
971 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > General Discussion > Book, Magazine, Gallery Reviews & Shows > Ansel Adams and the American Landscape in Dayton, Ohio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2003, 09:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7
Default

If you happen to find yourself around Dayton, Ohio between now and January, do yourself a favor and stop by the Dayton Art Institute to visit their current exhibit of Ansel Adams and the American Landscape.

http://www.daytonartinstitute.org/ex...ing_adams.html

I’d guess there are around 50 prints on display – mostly by Adams, but also including work by Edward, Brett, and Cole Weston, Eliot Porter, Stieglitz, Imogen Cunningham, Laura Gilpin, Paul Strand, Minor White, Siskind, and others. A pretty impressive lineup by any measure!

The only downside is the lighting in the section of the gallery showing the prints. It is pathetically dim and the lights are poorly aimed (seems to be a trend in galleries displaying photographic art?). I was sure to leave scathing remarks about the lighting in the comments book placed at the exit of the display. If you do the same, maybe they’ll get the message!

For the price of admission ($10 for visitors, free for members), you also get to see an exhibit of The Glass of Louis Comfort Tiffany and Monet and the Age of American Impressionism. Both very much worth seeing.

Highly recommended.

Scott Whitford
swhitford is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 11-10-2003, 10:18 AM   #2 (permalink)
lee
 
lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 2,911
Default

Scott,
It is my understanding that the reason they purposefully leave the lights set the way you saw is to help make the prints last longer. All those photographers you mentioned are long dead and there will be no more images. So, one of the accepted ways to help preserve the longevity of the prints is not to have bright lights shining on them. It is a sad but necessary fact if we want the prints to be around for our later generations.

lee\c
lee is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using