Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,561   Posts: 1,545,292   Online: 765
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Dan Henderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Blue Ridge, Virginia, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,891
    Images
    241

    National Geographic Taken for a Ride

    Nat Geo has a feature they call "Your Shot," where readers can submit interesting photographs for publication. In the February issue they printed a photograph of a close up picture of a dog with his attention fixed on the photographer, and six Blue Angels jets streaking through the background.

    In the June issue just out, they report that several readers questioned the authenticity of the picture. After some investigation the magazine decided it was a composite; the rules specify "unmodified camera images."

    The picture shows the dog in sharp focus, with a tree and house in the background somewhat out of focus as if a large aperture had been used. Then the jets, which are obviously farther away than the house or tree, appear to be in fairly sharp focus. The article revealing the fake says that the editor who reviews these submissions looks at 300 pictures a day. She's going to be working a lot of overtime to catch the faked photographs possible in today's digital world.


    web site: Dan Henderson, Photographer.com

    blog: https://danhendersonphotographer.wordpress.com/

    I am not anti-digital. I am pro-film.

  2. #2
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    :rolleyes:

    Well, here is a link to it... they came down pretty harshly on Mr. Lascelles, and for good reason:

    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20...t/manipulation

    Now, this was a very poor attempt at a composite, there are signs of low-quality manipulation everywhere... even if the focus issue were missed. I am left with the conclusion that Mr. Lascelles did it for a laugh at nat geo's expense, just to make a point. If that's not the case then he really needs some workshops

    (Interesting side note: if this were a film double exposure then the shot would be acceptable, I presume; that's the way I read the rules. So maybe we should flood them with such...)

    But all that aside, it's too bad that nat geo seems more interested in spurious contrivances rather than photographs which actually say something about a subject. I mean, who really gives a flip about dogs and jets anyway! Even if it were real, it really belongs on the refrigerator.... not in one of the most prestigious photomagazines in circulation.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  3. #3
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,941
    Images
    33
    Deception in photography is nothing new. So long as there are places to display photos, there will be people who will do deceitful things to appear superior. IMO, these types of people dont get off displaying the photo, their delight is in knowing they have duped someone. Its shameful, and pitiful, not to mention how it shines a light on the rest of the legitimate followers of rules. Now that one has been found out to be a faker, all others will be suspect.
    Rick A
    Argentum aevum

  4. #4
    wclark5179's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    505
    Bill Clark

  5. #5
    johnnywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,255
    Images
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by keithwms View Post
    :rolleyes:

    I mean, who really gives a flip about dogs ......
    Heresy!!
    If I had been present at the creation, I would have given some useful hints for the better arrangement of the Universe.
    Alfonso the Wise, 1221-1284

  6. #6
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,780
    Photographically, it was over for Nat Geo some time ago.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,100
    Dogs are far more honest than humans. You would never find a dog submitting a PS image like that.
    Heavily sedated for your protection.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,843
    From I understand this has happen a fair amount.

    Jeff

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    central anatolia, Turkey
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    415
    Images
    16
    dogs submitting PS'ed images? i never would have thought...

  10. #10
    Worker 11811's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,620
    Require the photographer to submit camera negatives on demand. The problem will subside 99% if not disappear all together, virtually overnight.

    Randy S.

    In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.

    -----

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/randystankey/

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin