Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,924   Posts: 1,556,699   Online: 1176
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    jp498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Owls Head ME
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,467
    Images
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by ruby.monkey View Post
    At 750km/h, that plane is going to cover something like 15->30cm over the period of an exposure at that camera's highest shutter speed (even at 1/8000s, it would have moved about 10cm). How is the photographer supposed to get a sharp photo using natural light alone?
    Panning. It works.

  2. #12
    Matthew Wagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sandiacre, Nottinghamshire, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    97
    I agree totally with the OP. Too much money...
    Using http://johndudak.com/photographers/sp.php to work out the details that were given in the shot a shutter speed of at least 1/11364th would have had to have been used to 'catch' the jet in focus enough so there's a 0.01mm blur when printed.

    Using the profoto lights he's using, according to what I could find, they have a t1 time of 1/12,000 of a second. I didn't see how many profotos he ended up with but at 2400w/s per unit that is a hell of a lot of light power.

    Sure its an impressive show off promo for Profoto and Hassleblad but I'm left cold as to the final image.

  3. #13
    vpwphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,109
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    7
    This guy impresses me more... and he did a lot of his work with flash bulbs... only one shot at the shot... train/light/bulbs only there once a day.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._Winston_Link

    Money and time can accomplish anything, I'm sure 80% of the people shooting professionally/or seriously can do the "jet" photo if the client requested it and you had access to the lighting.
    Personally I could do it with my gear I have now, but I would have been un-elegant and used gasoline generators to power the lights. Or run a few cords from the tower on a small strip.

    Look at the 6th image in this series...(link below) I stopped a shot-gun shell impact with no timer no nothing on the first try. Client was too cheap to let me rent the shutter trigger from Calumet in Chicago. Just about everything I do is on the cheap here... I resent it sometimes, the Bosch advert was done in an abandoned building the AD found... I told her we were trespassing... but the shoot went on.

    I was surprised the first shot was the best... we fired about 10 shells , early or late on most of the others.

    http://vincentseye.com/job/things/

    I drive a used older Audi... perhaps I can buy his used Porsche one day. I'm happy here. Good/day/evening apug peoples.

    +1 Matt from the UK -- cheers.
    +1 JP948
    Last edited by vpwphoto; 11-15-2013 at 05:08 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,424
    Images
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by Mainecoonmaniac View Post
    I think it's a digital Hassy feature.
    Ok, but why? Does it always do that?
    “You seek escape from pain. We seek the achievement of happiness. You exist for the sake of avoiding punishment. We exist for the sake of earning rewards. Threats will not make us function; fear is not our incentive. It is not death that we wish to avoid, but life that we wish to live.” - John Galt

  5. #15
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,054
    Images
    6

    I think it's the nature of that expensive beast

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2013-11-15 at 3.30.58 PM.png 
Views:	35 
Size:	114.4 KB 
ID:	76987
    Quote Originally Posted by pbromaghin View Post
    Ok, but why? Does it always do that?
    "Photography, like surfing, is an infinite process, a constantly evolving exploration of life."
    Aaron Chang

  6. #16

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    A camera with a 1 second delay is totally worthless.

  7. #17
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,770
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Did a little googling and the delay is programmable, the intent is to reduce the shake from mirror slap.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  8. #18
    Matthew Wagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sandiacre, Nottinghamshire, UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by vpwphoto View Post
    Look at the 6th image in this series...(link below)
    Wow that's impressive

  9. #19
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,770
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    With regard to using flash in this situation, actually as in most any situation, it is to make printing easier and improve the photo's quality level. Think of it as doing the bulk of the burn and dodge work when the shutter drops instead of doing it "in the enlarger" and avoiding under exposure of the subject is important. He may have been stopped down a ways to keep the DOF long.

    Also, we can't always wait for a sunny day, nor might we want to; a sunny day would not have the same dramatic background these shots did.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  10. #20
    vpwphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,109
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Wagg View Post
    Wow that's impressive
    Thanks... I told the client before we went to the range I wasn't promising anything.
    Dumb luck and a little intuition.... those are crappy US made White-Lightning units that stopped the action.
    I joke White Lightnings are cheap only because they don't pay super-models and rent Ferrari and set dressers for their advertising.
    They just work.

    Regarding the use of the radio slave in the video (I know the point was to sell equipment) butI hard wired my shot there is enough delay in radio slaves that I find I have to run the Hasselblad at 1/250th and Nikons at 1/160th when using a radio slave of any sort. If I had to shoot this jet situation, I would have went hard wire also.
    This delay is mentioned in the instructions of most radio slaves I have used. Radio waves travel at the speed of light, but the signal processing on the chips is where this small delay comes from..
    ....impulse to trigger signal, to received signal, back to trigger impulse voltage takes a little time.
    Last edited by vpwphoto; 11-15-2013 at 08:55 PM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin