|
|
|
-
-
Hell, I haven't used a flash in years but when I did use flash a lot, I used a Minolta meter. IIIF? IVF? I don't remember the model but any of the Minolta meters were considered really good back back in the last century.
-
First choice: Minolta.
Second: Sekonic.
-
I've been using a Minolta Flashmeter III for years. Haven't found any reason to upgrade to a newer meter, which would only add features that aren't really necessary (averaging, memory, etc.).
-
I use a Gossen Profisix with a flash meter attachment. It works great, and I can leave the flash meter with the flashes.
In the USA, I think it is called a Luna Pro SBC.
If I were to buy new, I'd probably look long and hard at a Gossen digiflash, because I like the size.
Matt
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
Beano Brand-semiflash-orama - for semi-old farts 
Sekonic for those who won't admit it..
Matt's Photo Site
"I invent nothing, I rediscover". Auguste Rodin
-
I have a Sekonic L-358 and it is accurate & easy to use.
The Minoltas are also good.
-
For incident/reflected only, the Sekonic 308/328. It will of course also do non-flash, but this is a good thing, because when used with a PC sync cord, it will compensate for the mix of ambient and strobe light together. If you want spot in addition, look for a used Sekonic 408. It has a 5 degree spot as well as incident and reflected metering. Another good used option is a Minolta Spotmeter F. It is a dedicated 1-degree spot.
-
My preference is for an older Gossen, the Ascor II, generally found cheaply on ebay, though I've lost a few due to somebody really wanting one. It just works, simple as pie. I have a Multipro and have had an ultrapro, and numerous Minolta's, yet in a studio environment, I fall back to the Ascor.
erie
-
A 358 if you're REALLY sure you don't want spot. The 558 if you do. Used prices on the 358 seem high to me. Not much point paying 90+% of new for a used meter. The 558 is so new that finding used would be tough.
|
|