Discussions: 45,235 | Messages: 609,906 | Members: 29,967 | Online: 403 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
SL66
Author: jmcd
13 view(s)
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1145 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
663 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
971 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Lighting > New to lighting--need advice...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2008, 12:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 413
Default New to lighting--need advice...

I would like to begin doing some simple (I hope) still-lifes and portraits/nudes that mimic natural light, but allow a little more control in terms of direction of light and also time of day/night. I am after a more shadowy look ala Bill Brandt or Andre Kertesz. I do not care to have highly illuminated magazine-style portraits. I shoot BW film and most often use a 35mm camera with a fairly fast lens. I may sometimes use a 645 as well. So, the question is will I be okay to start with two basic reflector type hot lights? What kind of wattage will I need for the bulbs? Thanks.
jmal is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-06-2008, 12:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,997
Blog Entries: 8
Default

You sure can. Hot lights eliminate a certain amount of guesswork over flash when you are just starting out. The drawbacks are heat, power needed vs. output, and fire. You should also test your stocks sensitivity to the spectrum, as many black and white films respond slower to the lower spectrum. Practical hot lights for the small studio/home run from about 250w to about 1000w. You can run with everything from halogen floods from the big box, to dedicated cinema instruments. The cheap way to control them is with cut foam core flags and bounces. You can get core that is white on one side and black on the other. It's worth investing in a few Century type stands to hold them, as being able to control the light is far more important than the light its self. This way you can create soft( big) light but still give it a direction, and keep it where you want. The wattage you require depends on how much you are trying to light. For a pleasing bounced light you will probably be looking at 500 to 1000 watts, depending on your rating.
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html

Last edited by JBrunner; 10-06-2008 at 12:18 PM.
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-06-2008, 12:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 413
Default

Thanks Jason. It sounds like I should be okay with something like this to start:
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_pro...=2601&pid=5124
jmal is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-06-2008, 12:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,997
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Those will work. Notice that they take Edison socket bulbs though. In higher wattages these have a fairly short lifespan. The ECT 500 for example cost about ten bucks (the cost will only go up as these bulbs become scarce) and averages 60hr. You might consider looking at something that takes halogen bulbs instead, but the ones you link to will get you started.
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-07-2008, 01:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
CBG
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 330
Default

Some folks will howl in protest, but the Lowel Tota lights have served me very well for some thirty years. High output and pretty long lamp life. I do use them mostly for color work, so for BW you should be able to far exceed the rated life. They are also incredibly compact and pretty rugged.

(www.lowel.com)

C
CBG is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 10-07-2008, 07:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: third stone from the sun
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBG View Post
Some folks will howl in protest, but the Lowel Tota lights have served me very well for some thirty years. High output and pretty long lamp life. I do use them mostly for color work, so for BW you should be able to far exceed the rated life. They are also incredibly compact and pretty rugged.

(www.lowel.com)

C
Another vote for a tota light. The freestyle kit is pretty rinky dink and not very useful. Lightshaping tools are a necessity. A four by four open frame and a sheet of lee 215 or 251 diffusion is going to give you much more kick as a fill than a 500watt open face bounced into white bead board. You should really be thinking about a big soft source for fill or soft key and a more directional light like a 650 or 1000 watt fresnel for a key. If I were just getting into this again I'd find a tota off ebay (or even better yet a mole broad light), a fresnel (like a used desisti, mole, ianaro, ltm or colortran), a couple of inexpensive baby stand like an amnova or amvona or whatever that chinese import co. is called, a 4x4 open frame like the collapsible one chimera sells or the lastolite frame, some diffusion for the 4x4, and two c-stands (try pyramid films) with arms to grip the 4x4, oh, and some black wrap and neutral density gel. I know it seems like a lot of crap to carry around but it's actually a very paired down yet very flexible kit. You should be able to put this kit together for approx. $500 - 600.
frotog is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-07-2008, 11:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,997
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Tota is ok, Arri is better, but costs more. (of course) There are tons of options. The best bang for the buck is a set of monolights. You didn't say why you want hot lights. Is there a particular reason?
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-08-2008, 09:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: third stone from the sun
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBrunner View Post
Tota is ok, Arri is better, but costs more. (of course) There are tons of options. The best bang for the buck is a set of monolights. You didn't say why you want hot lights. Is there a particular reason?
The tota light is an open face broad light. Arri makes pars, fresnels, and softlights. Two totally different kinds of lights - like comparing apples to oranges - one is not better than the other.

If light output is paramount (i.e. you're shooting without a tripod or you need to stop fast action) then yes, I too would go with the monolights. But unless you're shooting cats flying through the air or doing wedding formals on location, why bother with strobes? You have much better control over the quality and quantity of your lighting setup with continuous lighting for obvious reasons. And now with the demise of proofing materials the "wysiwyg" aspect of working with hot lights makes learning how to shape light a much easier thing to do than with strobes.
frotog is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-08-2008, 09:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 3,080
Default

I know nothing about your budget. It might be worthwhile for you to go to Home Depot or similar store and look at tungsten or similar lights that may be supplied with a stand. These may represent some savings for you and be quite useful. It is a long time since I have done this so I do not know what is available these days at what cost.
__________________
Claire (Ms Anne Thrope is in the darkroom)
Claire Senft is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 10-08-2008, 10:22 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
JBrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Posts: 3,997
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frotog View Post
The tota light is an open face broad light. Arri makes pars, fresnels, and softlights. Two totally different kinds of lights - like comparing apples to oranges - one is not better than the other.

If light output is paramount (i.e. you're shooting without a tripod or you need to stop fast action) then yes, I too would go with the monolights. But unless you're shooting cats flying through the air or doing wedding formals on location, why bother with strobes? You have much better control over the quality and quantity of your lighting setup with continuous lighting for obvious reasons. And now with the demise of proofing materials the "wysiwyg" aspect of working with hot lights makes learning how to shape light a much easier thing to do than with strobes.
The Arrilite, or "bluehair" as we call it is an open face reflector light that even has a limited focusing ability. The tota is what we call a "nook" light. A different, and less versatile design for an open face light, but useful for certain things. The bluehair can do everything a tota can do, and more. The Arrilite runs cooler, has the same output, is more controllable, and has a much higher build quality than the tota. It is, as I said, more expensive, as a result. I do know what I am talking about. You get outside the school, TV station, or vidiot production world, you don't see much Lowell. That said, if someone wanted to give me a couple of totas, I'd certainly take them, and they are more useful than the Edison floods in the OP.

Also, you can do anything with a couple of monolights that you can do with openface tungsten, regarding control and characteristic, and have the benefit, of reduced power needs and no heat, and of loads more output if you need it. The reduced sensitivity of B&W film to the low spectrum of hot lights won't help matters. With TriX for example, a 600watt light is a 300, as far as the film is concerned. It's a lot easier to dim a monolight than to wish you had more output when you don't have enough. Flash isn't just for stopping action. The learning curve is however, steeper.

It's all compromises, and hopefully from this information that the OP can make an informed decision that fits his needs/budget.

Alien Bees has some decent units for good prices. Some of the accessories are a bit cheesy, but the heads are very good. I would advise the OP to consider a couple of monolights as one possible solution from among the many.
http://www.alienbees.com/packages.html
__________________
--J Brunner, The Prints of Darkness


Developing video:
http://www.jasonbrunner.com/videos.html

Last edited by JBrunner; 10-08-2008 at 11:10 AM.
JBrunner is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using