Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,294   Posts: 1,535,473   Online: 1023
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    andronicus707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Rhode Island, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    11

    Metz and sync cords

    I have owned an older Metz 60 CT-4 and have used a sync cord to connect it to my Crown Graphic and also my Fuji GW/GSW 690 III. I'm thinking of updating to a Metz 50, 70, or 76 MZ-5. My question is: do these newer Metz flashes allow using a sync cord?

  2. #2
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    If you mean the wierd multi contact plug that goes into the side of the handle of the head, yes. I beileve that there are only 2 contacts used for a dumb cord , but more if there is a sca adapter, and some sort of automation going on with the camera.

    Look at the Paramount Cords web site. They have every permutation of Metz synch cord that is not OEM available to be made for you.
    my real name, imagine that.

  3. #3
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,763
    They do but I think with the cameras you have since they have no TTL flash capability I would stick to what I've got.
    Ben

  4. #4
    wiltw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    742
    The Metz 70 and 76 have LESS true POWER than your Metz 60 does, simply because the newer units have zoom heads and the rating is rather fictitious hype in being based upon the (135 format) lens FL coverage equivalence of 105mm. My Metz 45 has more power than the Metz 58, when the Metz 58 is set to 35mm coverage (same angle of coverage as the Metz 45). And the newer flashes are module dedicated, so have no connector socket for a PC connection at the camera...that is, my Metz 54 does not, so I have to assume the Metz 70/76 would not either.

  5. #5
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,763
    As I said, the OP is better sticking to his Metz 60, I can't imagine anyone needing a more powerful gun, mine will nearly remove wallpaper!
    Ben

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Just to strike a contrary note: i'd get rid of a Metz 60 unit in a flash.

    Having to carry not just a flash, with a cable running from it to the camera/lens, but also a heavy battery pack with a thick cable running from it to the flash is a pain in the posterior of considerable size.

    For the life of me, i can't understand why people put up with it.
    It's not a power thing, since the Metz 45 series are not even one stop less powerful.

    It can't be battery capacity either, since it is so much easier to carry spare batteries for an AA-consuming unit than having to haul that archaic battery pack around.
    And putting a set of fresh batteries in a 45 unit takes 3 seconds. If that long at all.

    Nor can it be cycle time, since the 60 units aren't faster than other units.

    Besides: doesn't it say "i have owned", perhaps as in "no longer do"?
    Last edited by Q.G.; 11-14-2009 at 05:10 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #7
    ozphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,116
    Images
    1
    It depends what the OP is using their 60-CT4 to light. I have found it invaluable to simulate "sunlight" on an awfully overcast day with a gel attached.
    If it's just to light smaller areas it is quite possibly overkill. And the weight is a killer - you could use the battery as a door stop once you buy another or give up photography. :o

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,951
    recycle time is faster with the 60 than the 45. Yes both have the same rating of about 6 seconds from full power. Not very impressive. But with typical straight on shot the 60 generally recycle in less that 0.2 sec.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Same as the 45s.
    But even if there is a difference, it is so small that it cannot be a deciding factor.

    So i (still) do not understand why anyone would want to walk around with a Metz CT 60.

  10. #10
    wiltw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    742
    Quote Originally Posted by Chan Tran View Post
    recycle time is faster with the 60 than the 45. Yes both have the same rating of about 6 seconds from full power. Not very impressive. But with typical straight on shot the 60 generally recycle in less that 0.2 sec.
    If you use a Quantum Turbo, you can shoot with the 45CL in under a minute full recycle.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin