Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,322   Posts: 1,536,902   Online: 1084
      

View Poll Results: How should organizers handle excahnge deadbeats?

Voters
26. You may not vote on this poll
  • Leave them alone

    0 0%
  • Handle it all in private and not in public

    16 61.54%
  • Do what you're doing

    3 11.54%
  • Make it all transparent and open

    6 23.08%
  • Other?

    1 3.85%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    gr82bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,224
    Images
    37

    How should organizers handle people not honouring their committments in exchanges?

    So, tell us what you think?

    Regards, Art.
    Last edited by gr82bart; 04-01-2006 at 08:17 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    Visit my website at www.ArtLiem.com
    or my online portfolios at APUG and ModelMayhem

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,241
    Images
    20
    For those for whom it's a big issue, my suggestion posted in another thread (how many new threads do we need on this topic?) is to create a kind of secure exchange, where the organizer collects the prints and redistributes them. That way everyone who sends a print gets a print, and those who don't send prints get nothing. The downside is more shipping (and everyone would probably have to make a small contribution for mailing costs), but the attraction is more security, and it's less administration than the debt collection approach.

    And for the rest of us, for whom the current exchanges seem to be working, we can continue participating in the existing exchanges, recognizing the possibility that return is not going to be 100%.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,320
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    436
    I say establish a rules set before the start of an exchange - make the rule set transparent and open, with benefits (continuing participation, receiving prints) and consequences (certain APUG priviledges suspended until compliance is verified). Failure to comply would be determined by some set criteria - IE failing to reply to a series of three consecutive messages over a period of three months, or providing a lame excuse (my dog ate the prints... for the third time, I lost the address, etc). Have some kind of three-strikes-and-you're-out deal - someone can legitimately fail to deliver in one exchange, but be allowed to continue participating. A second failure puts them on probation, and a third failure means permanent ban.
    I don't think making a public blacklist is necessary, but having a publicly posted policy on how one gets on the blacklist, and the steps required to get off the blacklist, would go a long way to remedying the problem.
    I'd also be in favor of creating a set of rules for sending poorly made prints, but that's so subjective a judgement call that I wouldn't want to be the one who has to do it. Someone could send a bad print, then claim (perhaps legitimately, perhaps not) that they are a novice and don't know any better. If you set up a grading system of novice to expert, how do you decide when someone is no longer a novice, versus a lazy slacker, versus just an incompetent printer?

  4. #4
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69
    chop off their genitals and feed their kidneys to wild turkeys.
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  5. #5
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,241
    Images
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera
    I'd also be in favor of creating a set of rules for sending poorly made prints, but that's so subjective a judgement call that I wouldn't want to be the one who has to do it. Someone could send a bad print, then claim (perhaps legitimately, perhaps not) that they are a novice and don't know any better. If you set up a grading system of novice to expert, how do you decide when someone is no longer a novice, versus a lazy slacker, versus just an incompetent printer?
    I'd rather leave the issue of print quality unregulated. No one wants to send out bad work, but not everyone recognizes good work, and that's a big part of the attraction of these exchanges--everyone gets to see what other people are really doing, and it raises the bar without having to add any new rules or official judging procedure. I've certainly seen this happen with the Traveling Portfolio. Sometimes it slows the portfolio down, because people decide that their planned contribution doesn't measure up, but if it sends them back to the darkroom for another week or two to make a better print than they've made before, then it's worth it, I think.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #6
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,320
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    436
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb
    I'd rather leave the issue of print quality unregulated. No one wants to send out bad work, but not everyone recognizes good work, and that's a big part of the attraction of these exchanges--everyone gets to see what other people are really doing, and it raises the bar without having to add any new rules or official judging procedure. I've certainly seen this happen with the Traveling Portfolio. Sometimes it slows the portfolio down, because people decide that their planned contribution doesn't measure up, but if it sends them back to the darkroom for another week or two to make a better print than they've made before, then it's worth it, I think.
    I agree- I don't think it is something you can successfully regulate, because A: some folks just aren't up skillwise yet
    B: what one person considers sub-par, 99 others might well say is excellent
    C: the ne'er-do-wells who intentionally contribute poor prints (when we know they are capable of much better) will always find an excuse or claim ignorance.

    You'd have far too many peoples' toes stepped on with some kind of quality regulation and prevent those lower on the learning curve from accessing the exchange. I just think it would be unfair for someone with 20 + years of darkroom experience and a gallery exhibition resume (for example) to get away with sending out poorly exposed, sloppily processed prints that needed spotting, regardless of the intended recipient. I just wouldn't want to have to be the policeman to make that call.

  7. #7
    Bruce Osgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, N.Y. USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,429
    Images
    45
    I'd listen to David, a well modulated voice of reason.

  8. #8
    gr82bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,224
    Images
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce (Camclicker)
    I'd listen to David, a well modulated voice of reason.
    Then YOU organize it.

    Art.
    Visit my website at www.ArtLiem.com
    or my online portfolios at APUG and ModelMayhem

  9. #9
    Bruce Osgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, N.Y. USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,429
    Images
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by gr82bart
    Then YOU organize it.

    Art.
    Leave it alone Art.

  10. #10
    gr82bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Culver City, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,224
    Images
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce (Camclicker)
    Leave it alone Art.
    Knowing before writing would be a good first step. Participating would be nice too.

    Just a thought.

    Art.
    Visit my website at www.ArtLiem.com
    or my online portfolios at APUG and ModelMayhem

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin