Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,955   Posts: 1,522,808   Online: 987
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    florida
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,152
    Images
    2

    Using Ilford Direct Positive Paper

    I have been really enjoying my entry into the world of pinhole photography. I am using the Ilford Titan with HP5 and Delta 100 depending on the weather; measuring the exposure with a Gossen Ultra Pro with incident readings (box speed) and converting with the Ilford exposure calculator. The film is developed in ID11 1:1 for the mfg recommended time @68F. Although I have only made 16 exposures so far and printed 4 in pt/pd all have been right on. I made a home-made "viewfinder" that has also worked very well.

    My question is... I have seen a number of references to pre-flashing the direct positive paper. Why? Or would that be determined by expecting a particular lighting situation? If so, what conditions?

    Thanks in advance for your input.

    http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    Flashing reduces contrast (maybe 1 paper grade) and increases speed (maybe 2x).

    Cheers,

    R.
    Free Photography Information on My Website
    http://www.rogerandfrances.com

  3. #3
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,553
    Images
    122
    It does for negative paper and film but is it still true when applied to direct positive?

    Steve.

  4. #4
    Joe VanCleave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    482
    Yes, I always preflashed direct positive paper. I've found for my process that the Harman Direct Positive FB paper requires about half the preflashed exposure that I would normally give grade 2 paper negatives.

    Conversely, the Efke RC direct positive paper, that came out a year or two ago, required much longer preflashed times than I would normally give paper negatives, almost 4x the value.

    So obviously I had to figure out these preflashed times for myself.

    How I determine the required amount of preflashed time is to set up the darkroom in the daytime, pour up the standard chemicals, set up a scene outdoors with which to photograph, and do a series of exposures with varying preflashed times. After development, the prints are examined when fully dry and the optimal print reveals the best preflashed time. Of course, you do this only after already having figured out, via a similar calibration test, what your working Exposure Index will be for the paper. I rate the Harman Direct Positive FB paper at ISO 1.6; others report slightly different values, which is okay. The important thing is being able to do your own testing, to arrive at what exposure times work best for you.

    -Joe



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin