Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,886   Posts: 1,520,617   Online: 1039
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Jersey Vic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Columbia County NY
    Shooter
    Holga
    Posts
    3,919
    Images
    187

    Paper neg developers and dilutions

    I'm looking for some starting points for developing hi and low contrast negs-
    I've been using Agfa Neutol WA on Agfa RC 312 and taking what it gives me (not too bad) but know that there's alot of knowledge out there regarding other developers and dilutions and was hoping for some guidance. Also-any process adjustments(water baths, stop baths, etc) would be welcome.
    Any input would be very appreciated.
    Thanks in advance for all your help.
    Cheers

  2. #2
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    To put it bluntly, you won't see any difference on RC paper whatever hoops you jump through.

    Agfa's RC is a little more responsive than Ilford's, but it still won't make any appreciable difference whatever you do.

    If you want to play with different developers and varying dilutions go for a FB paper, preferably warmtone.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  3. #3
    Dave Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Middle England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,894
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ole
    To put it bluntly, you won't see any difference on RC paper whatever hoops you jump through.

    Agfa's RC is a little more responsive than Ilford's, but it still won't make any appreciable difference whatever you do.

    If you want to play with different developers and varying dilutions go for a FB paper, preferably warmtone.
    As the APUG guardian of R/C paper I feel obliged to race to it’s defence.
    Given that most manufacturers use the same emulsion to coat both fibre and R/C why should one carrier paper type react differently to another to hard or soft developers? My experience, albeit limited to Kentmere and Ilford multigrade papers suggests that their R/C and fibre equivalents both print identically. Since R/C feels thinner, and certainly lays flatter, I would suggest that it would be the better carrier for the purpose required here. I will be interested to hear the result of any experimentation. It may be that if one wanted to oil the carrier paper to increase transparency then fibre paper may be better.
    Regards Dave.

    An English Eye


  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I have played extensively with both developers and toners, and found (among other things) Ilford MG IV FB to be much more responsive than MG IV RC to toning and developer changes. I eventually managed to get RC to take on a slightly wrm tinge in the highlights by using an extremely dilute and almost totally oxidised warm-tone developer - no other paper (including MG IV FB) could develop to completion in that soup. So at least for Ilford, the RC paper is marvellous in its stability and repeatability - but it's a wast of time and effort trying to get it to respond to different developers.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5
    Jersey Vic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Columbia County NY
    Shooter
    Holga
    Posts
    3,919
    Images
    187
    Thanks to you both for your replies.Ole-So then I take it that youre using MG IV FB for paper negatives? I have no problem using this paper for that purpose if it allows for good final prints. That being said, what developer(s) and dilution(s)has/have yielded you good printable paper negatives? And Of course I'd like to hear from anyone else who would like to weigh in on this matter. Also-I've been able to purchase some kentmere fiber paper lately and have noticed that it seems thinner than the others I've been using. Has anyone used this paper for this purpose.
    Again- Thanks

  6. #6
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I have used MG IV, but discovered that my leftover boxes of old Varycon PE RC were far better for the purpose. Not only does it have a much longer range of "blacks", but it also responds well to changes in developer and dilution. Since I also have only a few negatives which print better on this paper than others it makes sense to use it in-camera.

    BTW, it's sold as "ADOX" now.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  7. #7
    Dave Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Middle England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,894
    Images
    2
    R/C you say!!!!!! Should I add anything here; no much better to keep quiet
    Regards Dave.

    An English Eye


  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    19
    imo,

    if you want to lower contrast in paper negs,develop in dilute film developer- Rodinal- 1:50-1:100 ..D-76 1:2. and use a paper with out inc.developers.Pre-flashing also helps to keep the contrast in acceptable range.I have started experimenting with 2 bath development but I'm not sure yet if there is any real advantage to this.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    15,945
    i only use ansco 130 that is black as coca cola to process my paper negatives and a water bath. i can't speak for other developers ...
    dilute ( 1:5 or more ) submerge the paper in the developer until the image begins to appear then in the water --- go back and forth until you like what you see. thin paper negatives work best to get prints from. too "developed out" you will get a washed out positive.

    good luck!

    -john

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    19
    If your negs are too *thin*(underdeveloped) you will have little to no shadow detail.

    Pre-flashing works kind of like a mask,allowing more shadow detail(fuller development),without blowing out the highs(which I guess are slightly fogged)



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin