Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,499   Posts: 1,543,200   Online: 1090
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 5 by 4 Pinhole

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    18

    5 by 4 Pinhole

    Hi.
    Can anyone inform me if it is possible to get full coverage on 5 by 4
    if you only have a focal length of only two centimeters.I am in the process of
    making a pinhole camera which will be using fidelity dark slides. I think
    I may need to increase the focal length.

    Thanks Norman

  2. #2
    reellis67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Central Florida
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,887
    Images
    13
    There is a good online calculator at (http://www.mrpinhole.com) - just type in what you want and it will tell you what the optimal values are and what coverage you can expect. You can also download a nice utility here (http://www.pinhole.cz/en/pinholedesigner/)

    - Randy

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    18
    Thanks Randy

    With the info provided at mrpinhole.com I will certainly not get the coverage .It confirms that I will have to up the focal length of my project and settle for not such a wide view from the camera. It does make me wonder why the Zero 75 camera claims to get full coverage with only one section at 25 mm focal length though.

    Norman

  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    "Coverage" is a relative term. If your hole is thin enough, you will have "coverage" is that you can get an image with acceptable "sharpness" all the way into the corners. However the light loss in the corners with a 20mm "focal length" on 4x5" film will be tremendous! That's a 75 degree angle of incidence - assuming cos^4(theta), the light loss is about eight stops. This is assuming your hole material is thin enough that the edges don't overlap at that shallow an angle.

    So it may be sharp enough to call it "coverage" - just a pity there won't be enough light to make an image...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5
    smieglitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,863
    Images
    97
    Here is a pic taken with a camera of focal length ~25mm onto a 120 roll film holder. The camera was a 3/4" thick piece of plywood with a Graflock back attached to it making the focal length approximately 1" or 25 mm. You can see the vignetting in the corners already with this film.



    To see the coverage of this camera on a full 4x5 sheet (Fuji Acros Quickload) check out the following URL. Be forewarned the image is a nude:

    http://my.net-link.net/~jsmigiel/ima...dpile01.72.jpg

    Joe

  6. #6
    Dave Wooten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Vegas/mysterious mohave co. az, Big Pine Key Fla.
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,714
    Images
    20
    5 cm will cover (50 mm) @ f/154 -- covers 4 x 5 nicely...and is quite wide...

    figure 3.5 x's focal length for diagonal coverage....i.e. 25 mm x 3.5 = 87.5 mm diagonal,,,subtract the vignetting on Joe's photos above and it should be pretty close...(nice photos Joe)

  7. #7
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,815
    In addition to the cos^4(theta) fall-of in the corners that Ole mentioned, there will be reduced sharpness due to astigmatism. Yes, wide angle pinhole cameras do suffer from astigmatism, and all pinhole cameras have slight chromatic abberation, too. A center filter (expensive!) like those used on wide angle lenses might help. Another possibility is photographing an evenly illuminated blank white subject with enough exposure to place the corners of the film on the toe of the characteristic curve and develop it to a contrast index of about 1. Either sandwich this negative in front of the unexposed film in the film holder, or mount it in front of the holder. This should fairly well compensate for the vignetting, but will increase exposure time considerably. Undercompensation is probably desirable. Another option is prefogging the corners of the negatives slightly to increase response to the subject in the corners. This should help the corner shadows at the cost of the highlights.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    775
    Couldn't you make up for the loss of light be curving the film? Then the distance would be the same for all parts. I would think that the curve would be based on the distance between the center of the pinhole to the film plane at center of film. Then draw a sphere around the pinhole with that radius. Obviously this works better for wide strips of roll film than it will for 4x5, since you can almost ignore the verticle component and just deal with a curve in the horizontal component.

    The exposed (developed) white frame is an interesting idea, I would have never thought of that. If you made it small enough, could you put in in front of the "lens" to get the same effect? Then it would be just like any other graduated filter. Yes building it that much smaller would be more difficult, but it would be really handy to add or remove.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    18

    Decision made 5 by 4

    Thanks Guys
    It is nice to know that there is all knowledge and advice is out there to be taped.I have decided to stick with the 5 by 4 format and settle for a
    focal length of four inches this should give me around 60 degree angle of view
    with a pinhole of .018 thou.I am going to stick to the dark slide holders
    for convenience.If this all works out I will try to post some pictures.I also like Gregs suggestion about curving the film plane. Perhaps a mark 2 project
    may be attempted later. Who knows I may need further advice.

    Rgards Norman

  10. #10
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,815
    Greg -- Curving the film nearly eliminates the fall-off due to the corners of the film being further from the pinhole as it is with flat film. However, the light passes obliquely through the pinhole to reach the corners. Thus, the pinhole is effectively an ellipse with a minor axis less than the optimum diminsion.
    Last edited by Jim Jones; 07-07-2006 at 07:43 PM. Click to view previous post history.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin