Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 73,158   Posts: 1,614,129   Online: 839
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eastern, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,020
    Images
    55

    paper negs, reducing contrast

    g'day all'
    i've been experimenting to determine a means of reducing contrast when using rc vc paper for negs in sunlight

    what is the most successful method?

    pre-flash?

    post-flash?

    '0' vc printing filter on lens?

    a combination?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,014
    Images
    1
    I use a 00 filter on my pinhole camera and it seems to work a bit. I've read about flashing the paper but never tried it. I have learnt that you can't judge a paper neg by looking at it, you need to print it to see just how it has come out.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The Canary Islands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    220
    Images
    33
    Like Nige, I started with a 00 filter behind the pinhole, but pre-flashing is a much more effective solution. I haven't tried post-flashing.

  4. #4
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,927
    Blog Entries
    1
    A third method is to use a softer working developer. Selectol Soft or its equivalent comes to mind.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    17,166
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    3
    you also might give a semi-exhausted developer and a water bath a try ...

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
    Shooter
    Pinhole
    Posts
    53
    Ray, there isn't a good, reliable answer to your question; it depends so much on the spectral sensitivity of the paper. Many pinhole photographers use graded paper, usually Grade 2, which is not nearly as contrasty as variable contrast paper. In tests with Ilford's fibre matte paper, I found using a deep yellow, like Wrattan 12, reduces the contrast to a good tonal range. Here is link to a discussion of this topic on the f295 forum. It includes photos of the test I did with the yellow filters.
    http://www.f295.org/Pinholeforum/for...155943597/s-0/

  7. #7
    Jersey Vic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Columbia County NY
    Shooter
    Holga
    Posts
    3,919
    Images
    187
    Hi Ray;

    Either the 00 filter (tape mine in the front but will tape it inside next time) or the Hc-110 dil B has worked well by me. The weak developer and water bath method allow me to develop the highlights by inspection which I found to be really useful. I found all the RC VC papers work well enough this way

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    146

    Softer paper neg. contrast

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Vic View Post
    Hi Ray;

    Either the 00 filter (tape mine in the front but will tape it inside next time) or the Hc-110 dil B has worked well by me. The weak developer and water bath method allow me to develop the highlights by inspection which I found to be really useful. I found all the RC VC papers work well enough this way
    You can get a lesser contrast in a paper negative by simply over exposing it. Even though it will look overly dark the negative will actualy print quite well. I have been using agfa RC VC or grade 2. Contrast filters help too.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin