Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,925   Posts: 1,556,754   Online: 1021
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Dave Wooten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Vegas/mysterious mohave co. az, Big Pine Key Fla.
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,718
    Images
    20

    Bronica RF 645 ?

    Are there any users of the Bronica RF 645...if so could you coment on the quality, reliability and your impression...
    Thanks
    Dave in Vegas

  2. #2
    Jeffrey A. Steinberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Scarsdale, NY
    Posts
    296
    I don't own this camera so take my comments accordingly:

    I never understood this camera. While it is cheaper than a Mamiya 7, if you are going for a MF rangefinder, why not get a 6x7 format camera? It also has a funny orientation that I have never understood--to get a landscape photo you have to hold the camera in its vertical aspect (and visa versa).

    With Bronica exiting the medium format SLR business how long will they support this camera.

    I own and love the Mamiya 7. I think for the price of a new Bronica 645 (there are not that many used ones since its relatively new), you can get a nice used Mamiya 7. And the Mamiya with the 43 or 50 mm lens is amazing.
    --Jeffrey

    ______________________________________________
    Jeffrey Steinberg, K2MIT
    Scarsdale, NY

    www.jsteinbergphoto.com (my avocation)
    www.reversis.com (my vocation)

  3. #3
    fingel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    298
    Images
    4
    I've never gotten 6x7, why turn your camera at all when you could shoot square like God intended...

    I haven't used the Bronica either, but I'm sure it is a solid camera just like their SLR's. The only problem that I can see is lack of available lenses (I've only seen three) but they are reasonably priced, even the wide lens.
    Scott Stadler

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,025
    There are reasons to go for the Bronica. In the UK it is still half the price in all respects, whether it be kits or lenses. It is slightly smaller and lighter and arguably more solid (my opinion) and certainly ergonimically superior IMHO. The vertical orientation suits people and place photography just as well as the horizontal, but admitedly not landscapes so well. If there is a lot going on 16 frames gives you less time changing films and the integral darkslide thingy is a big improvemnt over the Mamiya. 645 gives you the chance to show grain too, using fast films. 6x7 is going to look creamier, which might not be what you want for street photography

    I would seriously consider one for travel/reportage. Most shots would be mono and printed to moderate sizes only and as many would be vertical shots as horizontal. For the price of a M7 plus 50mm plus 150, you can get RF645 plus 45 plus 100 plus flash, filters etc plus a great used 5x4 outfit! I love the idea of the M7 but I think the lenses are crazy money. Perhaps the RF645 could be characterised as leaning towards reportage and the M7 towards landscape?

    Tom

  5. #5
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,350
    Images
    20
    Looks like a nice compact MF rangefinder with good lenses, and fairly reliable from reports I've read. I'm not a fan of the 645 format and would probably lean toward the M7II, if I were buying such a camera, but I can see the attractions of the Bronica.

    The reason for the vertical frame orientation is that horizontal frame orientation would require vertical film travel.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #6
    craigclu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NW Wisconsin, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    774
    I've had one for a quite a long time. It's a nice, light alternative to my 6X7 slr gear and tends to actually be with me instead of sitting next to the 6X7 stuff at home! First class optics, very fast to operate and it is a gratifying nice piece of gear to own. I seem to get pulled into wedding projects and people-oriented (my company magazine) sorts of things that the vertical format is ideal for. Albums and magazines seem to flow better with vertical orientation so it seems tailor made for this duty. Every medium format camera has its advantages and they're basically all good image grabbers. The 645RF has its place in some folks' bags and would be used little by others. I use the 6X7 gear if I know I will likely be making large prints but I've gotten some very stunning 11X14's from the little Bronica, too. I think that the Mamiya 7 may be a better system to buy into and likely expect a future with. It's not much bigger, its optics are said to be the best available and you'd get that nice, big negative to work from. They don't have the tactile feel of quality for the price they command but I think I could get used to that plasticky, hollow sounding rig if the results are there!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    222
    Images
    42
    I have owned both Mamiya 7 and Bronica RF645 - I have kept the Bronica and sold the Mamiya. The Mamiya was OK, but I liked using the Bronica so much more - (auto dark slide, viewfinder info, grip, controls on back). I found that most of the time I was doing vertical shots which the Bronica is designed to do. The auto functions/metering on the Bronica are also a notch up from the Mamiya and while the bodies are about the same size there is a big differece in the size of the lenses. I use the wide alot, the normal some, and the short tele rarely. Also, here in the US the Bronica with two lenses and the matching flash cost just a little more than a Mamiya body with normal lens. However, there are more lenses in the Mamiya line to customize your set up. I found the quality of the negitives from either camera to be top notch - you should be able to do very nice work with either of these. Best thing to do is to hold each of them, and see which feels better - especially when you need to rotate them out of their normal position.

  8. #8
    Dave Wooten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Vegas/mysterious mohave co. az, Big Pine Key Fla.
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,718
    Images
    20
    thanks so much for the input so far...I have held the RF 645 Bronica and loved the quality feel as well as the balance in hand.....I have not as of yet met or seen another actual user of the camera....it seems to be a good pack around camera for street and "street studio" work, I actually like the vertical orientation of this camera, the shutter is exceptionally quiet, I have never used a leica so don't know how to compare there, the lens of course will not be as fast, f/4, but most of my street stuff is daytime and I am not afraid at all to pop on the flash.

    It also takes 220 without modification, the 45mm set up seems too cool, I might go for this 3 lens set up....any more users out there! Thanks again apuggers
    Dave in Vegas

  9. #9
    bobfowler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, Land of the Living Dead
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,440
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by fingel
    I've never gotten 6x7, why turn your camera at all when you could shoot square like God intended...
    Well said!
    Bob Fowler
    fowler@verizon.net
    Some people are like Slinkies. They're really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.

  10. #10
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,350
    Images
    20
    PS--If you're wondering what a MF rangefinder camera with vertical film travel would look like, here's a page on the 6x7 Linhof 220 (which has both vertical film travel and vertical image orientation, since it's 6x7, but if you imagine it as a 645 camera, it would have horizontal image orientation)--

    http://www.marriottworld.com/stock_p.../linhof220.htm

    The design, which resembles a 1960s broadcast microphone, never really caught on.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin