Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,056   Posts: 1,561,397   Online: 1175
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,286
    Images
    21
    I also have the 21/4 and have used it a bit on several different bodies. No complaints; its quality may not be the equal of Leica/Zeiss in a laboratory environment, but nothing I've seen makes me think that those differences are important for my uses. I just looked through some photos for which I've used it (http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=67439103@N00&q=21%2F4) and I see vignetting in some of them, but nothing to worry about. (The ones where it's strongest are in infrared, where vignetting is always exaggerated.)

    I think it's safe to say that the quality of the lens is more than good enough for exploring the focal length.

    -NT
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1
    I have the M mount 21/4 and use it on a Bessa R4A. It is an awesome lens and very sharp to my surprise. It is small and really solid. I have several photos taken with it on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/felixwo...skopar21mmf40/.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin