Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,170   Posts: 1,658,564   Online: 933
      
Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 267891011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 135
  1. #111
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,800
    Keep in mind that the OP wasn't asking if a Leica was worth the money, he was asking if the possible appreciation of the camera would offset credit card interest. I think most of us would agree that it won't.
    That's just, like, my opinion, man...

  2. #112

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by JBrunner View Post
    Keep in mind that the OP wasn't asking if a Leica was worth the money, he was asking if the possible appreciation of the camera would offset credit card interest. I think most of us would agree that it won't.
    I certainly agree with all the comments here about debt, and credit card debt in particular. I would never suggest someone buy a camera on credit except in the unlikely situation where it was necessary for work that would lead to paying off the debt.

    Still, I don't know the OP's situation, and you have to figure in the cost of selling something and repurchasing it later. If I had a camera outfit that worked as I expected and suited my needs, I wouldn't be in a hurry to let it go. I would be inclined to find a way to pay it off promptly. Some creative thinking might even lead to a way to do that with photography, and promote yourself and your work at the same time. Maybe host a Leica payoff show with prints at reasonable prices. Or maybe your photography services as a Leica payoff promotion. I'm sure someone more creative than me could come up with other ideas.

    If that ain't gonna work, then yeah, get out of debt however you can.

  3. #113

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    934
    Very few objects will outperform cost + interest in the short or medium term. Maybe house flippers in the boom and precious metal specialists came good but the safest way to collect is to buy something very few possess, and pay the going rate. If you see 'collectible', 'classic' or 'vintage' next to a sale, run a mile.

  4. #114
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post

    I don't know about your country, here... I'll just use my house as an example, the 2 family I have, in a dilapidated neighborhood, (which means the rental prices are actually good for renters and bad for landlords) my house mortgage per month is $2,300 on a 30 year mortgage, that includes taxes and insurance cost. .. the downstairs rent is $1,000 and the upstairs rent is $1,600 which yields $2,600 - $2,300 = $300 profit per month = $3,600 per year - $2,000 average maintenance = $1,600 net profit... this covers the home cost and then a little extra. 20 years from now that will sell for at LEAST $500,000 if not more and I've only invested $5,000 total to buy, fix up, refinance, and rent.
    Sorry to continue the OT.

    I think the house market you live in is deeply distorted by some economic factors, which is probably law. It's not a normal market.

    You say that it is somehow natural that rent costs more than mortgage (we assume no down payment) because the rented house is usually bought on a mortgage and the owner uses the rent to pay the mortgage. This is, again, the result of a deeply distorted market.

    In a normal market, "rent" is the interest you pay on the capital you borrow (the house), while "mortgage" is the interest you pay on the capital you borrow (which you use to pay the house) PLUS restitution of the capital. In economic terms rent cannot be higher than mortgage unless there are factors which distort the normal behaviour of rational capital allocators.

    If you take your mortgage "plan" you see that for each instalment there are two parts: the quota capitale and the quota interessi, they correspond to the share of borrowed capital you are giving back with that instalment, and the interest on the residual capital you borrowed (initial capital minus the capital you gave back with previous mortgage instalment).

    If it were possible to buy a house with a mortgage and rent it for a sum equal to the mortgage instalment I would have no hesitation in doing it several times as this means that somebody (either the person renting or the bank lending) is giving me a house for free. Again in a normal market there is no free lunch and no free house.

    I know this was possible in the US before the crisis but this was the result of distorting factors which were unique to the US market (maybe something similar happened in the Spanish market).

    The idea that houses inevitably rise in value in the long run is at the origin of the last US house bubble and, like any idea behind any bubble, it is more based on wishful thinking and greed than sound economic theory and inevitably bursts leaving somebody with a hard lesson (and somebody else rich, naturally).
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  5. #115
    georg16nik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    882
    Images
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Diapositivo View Post
    Sorry to continue the OT.

    I think the house market you live in is deeply distorted by some economic factors, which is probably law. It's not a normal market. ..
    Amen brother, its not only the house market in US, its Leica that is distorted, completely and irreversibly
    Regards,
    Georg

  6. #116
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,089
    Images
    1
    The simple fact is, as originally stated, if one can afford a reasonable down payment and can qualify for a market rate 30 year fixed rate mortgage, then the mortgage payments on a single family detached house will be lower than what one would expect to pay to rent the exact same home. Case in point: my own home, a modest three bedroom, two baths 1500 square feet. Monthly mortgage payment is around $1500 (principal, interest property taxes). Were I to rent this house, I could easily rent it for $3000 per month...maybe more. The market here is such that I could also sell the house for more than double what I paid fifteen years ago.

  7. #117
    Diapositivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,844
    Quote Originally Posted by BradS View Post
    The simple fact is, as originally stated, if one can afford a reasonable down payment and can qualify for a market rate 30 year fixed rate mortgage, then the mortgage payments on a single family detached house will be lower than what one would expect to pay to rent the exact same home. Case in point: my own home, a modest three bedroom, two baths 1500 square feet. Monthly mortgage payment is around $1500 (principal, interest property taxes). Were I to rent this house, I could easily rent it for $3000 per month...maybe more. The market here is such that I could also sell the house for more than double what I paid fifteen years ago.
    If that's the situation I don't understand what prevents you from renting your house for $3000/month and buy on mortgage another house for $1500/month.
    Fabrizio Ruggeri fine art photography site: http://fabrizio-ruggeri.artistwebsites.com
    Stock images at Imagebroker: http://www.imagebroker.com/#/search/ib_fbr

  8. #118
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,089
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Diapositivo View Post
    If that's the situation I don't understand what prevents you from renting your house for $3000/month and buy on mortgage another house for $1500/month.
    simple...
    1) all of this is conditional upon having a reasonably large down payment
    2) although 10% is an entirely reasonable down payment for one's primary residence, 35% is more likely considered the minimum required for the down payment on a rental property
    3) I do not have a reasonable down payment for a rental property that I would consider living in (there is a subtlety here which is attributable to the California property tax code - the details of which I will spare you at this time).


    You have observed that the housing market is distorted. It is true. There are significant tax advantages pertaining to interest paid on the mortgage for the home you live in...However, that is not generally the case for the house you rent to another.
    Last edited by BradS; 01-07-2013 at 04:42 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: make thoughts a little more concise.

  9. #119
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,848
    Quote Originally Posted by blockend View Post
    We've already lost Kodachrome, infra red and high speed colour negative films, and are reliant on a single manufacturer for transparency material.
    800 ISO CN film is still manufactured and available rebranded in types 135 and 127. (I know there once was even much faster film...)

    E-6 films are still made by two manufacturers. All available to consumers.

  10. #120

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    8,093
    Images
    228

    Is the Leica an "Investment?"

    Quote Originally Posted by AgX View Post
    800 ISO CN film is still manufactured and available rebranded in types 135 and 127. (I know there once was even much faster film...)

    E-6 films are still made by two manufacturers. All available to consumers.
    Question 1, who sells the 127

    Question 2, who sells E-6 besides Fuji?

    Links to shops with good pricing would be ideal if you don't mind sharing.


    ~Stone

    Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin