Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,294   Posts: 1,535,487   Online: 1042
      
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 58
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    997
    A Bessa R and any of the great FSU lenses would be my recommendation. I love those cameras. Build quality is NOT Leica-like, but they have an excellent meter, are reasonably priced, the shutters go to 1/2000, and the viewfinders are big and bright. Very reliable. Buy this kit and invest in a ton of Tri-X w/ the money you'd save over a Leica.

  2. #22
    Regular Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Derbyshire
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    450


    OR Less expensive and easier to carry around...




    RR

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26
    Kodak Signet 40. Around 10 bucks.
    If you don't like it or it breaks, no big deal.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    OK, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    268
    Images
    5
    Canon made quite a few rangefinder cameras in the early days. At present I only own one rangefinder camera, that being the Canon IIS2. I previously owned the Canon III, and consider both of these to be fine cameras.

    Here's a list of those early Canon rangefinder cameras.

    Many of these can be found on eBay in excellent condition, and at a reasonable price.
    Last edited by DannL.; 03-28-2014 at 11:20 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    112
    Sort of seconding Steve T above, get a Kodak Signet 35. It focuses down to 2 feet and has an Ektar lens, 44mm f3.5 IIRC. The shutter has only 4 speeds and is the weak point of the system but the pictures are great. As a rule of thumb, any lens that Kodak called an Ektar will punch way above its weight.


    --nosmok

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,378
    Quote Originally Posted by DannL. View Post
    Canon made quite a few rangefinder cameras in the early days. At present I only own one rangefinder camera, that being the Canon IIS2. I previously owned the Canon III, and consider both of these to be fine cameras.

    Here's a list of those early Canon rangefinder cameras.

    Many of these can be found on eBay in excellent condition, and at a reasonable price.
    I have a IIb, it's like having a Barnack Leica with a better viewfinder - one window and three(!) magnifications. Lovely little cameras, alas mine is in such nice condition I wouldn't use it for day-to-day walking around with. The build quality of these cameras is superb.

  7. #27
    Pioneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Elko, Nevada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    991
    Images
    4
    My recommendation would be to find one of the CV (Cosina Voigtlander) Bessa 35mm rangefinders. They are all great cameras and they are current so you are not trying to work with cameras that are 40 to 60 years old. The Bessa R takes the older threadmount (Leica Screw Mount - LTM) lenses, though Cosina Voigtlander has built new versions as well. The rest, Bessa R2A & M through Bessa R4 use the Leica M (bayonet) mount.

    I personally work with the Bessa R, the Bessa R2C (uses the older Contax mount) and the Bessa R2M. They are all great cameras and, if you keep your eyes open, come up on E-Bay as well as the Rangefinder.com forum classifieds, on a relatively frequent basis. Prices are usually around $300 for the Bessa R, and a bit more expensive for the R2 or R3.

    Of course there is always the older models of Leica, Nikon and Canon, not to mention fixed lens models that were put out by Kodak, Agfa and others in the 50s, and Japanese manufactured fixed lens versions from Konica and the like in the 70s. All good cameras and all are lots of fun.

    Personally, my favorite is the Agfa Ambi-Silette rangefinder that was produced in the fifties. It was known as the "Poor Mans Leica" and has one of the best viewfinders I have ever seen. There were 4 lenses built for it.

    Good luck with your search and have fun.
    Dan

    The simplest tools can be the hardest to master.

  8. #28
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,909
    Images
    1
    Some cheaper RF cameras I've used that are well built with decent lenses are the Konica Auto S2 and the Ricoh 519. For compactness do not forget the Olympus XA. Great lens.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    211
    I've read the Jupiter-12 rear element will make contact with the Bessa internals so that FSU lens would not be an option. I have one I use on my Zorki's though and I like it. At ~$100 avg for a good copy with caps it isn't bad for the price.

    To the OP: I just got into RF's a few months ago and decided on Zorki RF's for some of the same reasons of economy you state. I'm an SLR guy and I just wanted to play around with RF's and see how I like them. I didn't, and still don't, want to invest a ton of money into an RF system. I did entertain the thought of getting one of the LSM Canon's but decided finish out my Zorki collection and stay with all FSU equipment. Word of warning about the FSU RF's though. I've purchased 4 Zorkis, one was for parts, one was 100% functional, the other two have slow speed shutter issues and some rear curtain speed issues, but they still take great photos. In my opinion you need to be mechanically minded and able to perform some minor maintenance on these things to keep them working and be able to work around minor problems. That being said, I am told that once these things have undergone a full CLA they work like a charm again. I have contacted Fedka to set up a CLA for at least one of my older ones to see if I can't get it to functioning at 100%.

    Links to photos with my Zorki's (lens info on each photo):
    '56 Zorki 3S: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031...7642781383815/
    '61 Zorki 4: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031...7642780888575/
    '71 Zorki 4: http://www.flickr.com/photos/9565031...7642783363733/

    Quote Originally Posted by momus View Post
    A Bessa R and any of the great FSU lenses would be my recommendation. I love those cameras. Build quality is NOT Leica-like, but they have an excellent meter, are reasonably priced, the shutters go to 1/2000, and the viewfinders are big and bright. Very reliable. Buy this kit and invest in a ton of Tri-X w/ the money you'd save over a Leica.
    Last edited by Lamar; 03-28-2014 at 06:24 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7
    If you're patient, you can get a Nikon S2 with a 50 f/1.4 lens for less than $500.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin