Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,727   Posts: 1,515,070   Online: 1123
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    174

    Which body for Zeiss lenses

    I am really leaning towards a Minolta CLE, but I could also use a
    Leica CL, M6/7 (too much $ for me), Bessa R2A/3A, or the Ikon.

    I plan on eventually buying the 90, 50, 35 and 25mm lenses.

  2. #2
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,157
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    432
    the CL/CLE may have a hard time handling some of those lenses. Go with either the Bessa or the actual Ikon.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    A lot depends on aperture. The longer RF base of the ZI will handle fast lenses better.

    Cheers,

    Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com)

  4. #4
    Dave Wooten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Vegas/mysterious mohave co. az, Big Pine Key Fla.
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    2,713
    Images
    20
    are you wanting just rangefinder? the 50 mm planar is made for nikon and is f 1.4

  5. #5
    Uncle Bill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oakville and Toronto Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,367
    Images
    308
    I would try and swing for the Zeiss Ikon or the Bessa R2a/3a. The other option is a Leica M2 or M4-P. The Leica/Minolta CL is an interesting camera but you might have an easier time with the Leica M ,ZI and Voightlander.

    Bill
    "Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once and a while, you might just miss it."
    Ferris Bueller

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    861
    A used M6 or M6TTL might cost you near what a new Zeiss Ikon will run. If you shop carefully you might find one in your price range. However, other than price, you would ideally need to handle the actual camera body. The rounded edges of a Leica M might fit your grip better, or you might find that a Zeiss Ikon is easier to use. An M4-2 or M4P are cheaper than an M6, though they have no built in light meter. Functioning is fairly close, and you should be able to find good clean used examples that work fine. Many choices.

    Ciao!

    Gordon

  7. #7
    JosBurke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    KY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    462
    Images
    9

    Zeiss Glass

    I assume you have an affliction just as I do for Zeiss Glass--From my Hasselblads to my Linhof 75 mm Zeiss Biogon and my Linhof 250 mm Zeiss Sonnar--don't have a Planar yet---- I had an M3 and really like a Rangefinder but then I made the mistake of using a Mamiya 7II---out went the M3 from lack of use and my god those Mamiya lenses are sharp and that 6x7 neg just impresses me and it blows away my Hasselablad in terms of sharpness--really !! So for me the rangefinder is the Mamiya with Mamiya glass--I have my Hasselblad with Zeiss and my Linhof with the even more obscure Zeiss Glass but for a rangefinder again the Mamiya 7 II !
    Joseph Burke

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    174
    Yes, I had a M7 and may migrate back to one eventually. A super sharp camera for sure. Recently I ran into that bluefire 35mm film. Super super sharp and grain free. Its not copex or imagelink, as it seems to be something different. Also gigabit is just relabeled Copex. I shot a test roll of bluefire with a Contax YC 50mm lens and scanned it on my minolta 5400II and the scans had a 2 pixel soft edge or basically some of the sharpest photos I have ever scanned at 5400 dpi.

    I have also drum scanned a Mamiya 7 E100G shot at 4000 dpi and it is sharp also, but not at this bluefire level.

    I was pretty much blown away, and considering those were just test snapshots, I think the film could even carry more detail with a better lens system.

    I just wish they made it in 120.

    At any rate, I like small light rangefinders and with this 35mm film is close to medium format with something like acros.

    Right now I am revamping my camera setup and trying to come up wiith a super sharp slr 6x8 MFcamera with movements, that does not weigh 10#. It will probably be a custom.

    Also a zeiss RF, probably a M7 later, and a super light 8x10 feild camera. Super light and 8x10 do not go together but I am going to try and keep it under 5-6#. Not that it will really help a lot since the film holders are over 1# each.


    Quote Originally Posted by JosBurke
    I assume you have an affliction just as I do for Zeiss Glass--From my Hasselblads to my Linhof 75 mm Zeiss Biogon and my Linhof 250 mm Zeiss Sonnar--don't have a Planar yet---- I had an M3 and really like a Rangefinder but then I made the mistake of using a Mamiya 7II---out went the M3 from lack of use and my god those Mamiya lenses are sharp and that 6x7 neg just impresses me and it blows away my Hasselablad in terms of sharpness--really !! So for me the rangefinder is the Mamiya with Mamiya glass--I have my Hasselblad with Zeiss and my Linhof with the even more obscure Zeiss Glass but for a rangefinder again the Mamiya 7 II !

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    You said: "Right now I am revamping my camera setup and trying to come up wiith a super sharp slr 6x8 MFcamera with movements, that does not weigh 10#. It will probably be a custom."

    My personal solution to this problem is a 2.25 x 3.25 Crown Graphic (with coupled rangefinder). I have several super sharp lenses for it which include a 150mm f9 Docter Optics Apo Germinar and a 110mm Schneider Super Symmar XL

    Of course, both of these lenses also work well on my 8.9 lb Wehman 8x10 Field Camera (with 4x5, 5x7 and 8x10 backs).
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    canada
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4
    i have the 25/35/50 zm lenses and am very happy with them.
    i was lucky enough to find a brand new 90/2.8 hexanon lens so i have my set for the zi camera.
    the lenses fit but are large on my cl body.

    i'd suggest getting the zi body for the zm lenses, they were made for each other

    joe

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin