Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,661   Posts: 1,481,610   Online: 899
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, MO USA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    15
    I also have a Canonet with a 40mm lens.
    Recently I started to use Zeiss ZM Biogon 35/2.
    For me the 40 mm lens always felt a bit tight. I now know I prefer the 35 mm field of view.

    willie

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Louisiana, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,325
    I think you would be happier with the 35mm.

    I'm being presumptuous here. Forgive me.

    It's really not a matter of the 50 and 40 being too close in focal length, it's a matter of getting a focal length to fit within your current system. The 21mm to the 50mm is a big stretch.

    Besides, the 35/2.5 Color Skopar is a really nice little lens.

  3. #13
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    11,565
    Images
    59
    Unfortunately, I don't have a Leica rangefinder, but if I did, I would probably look to match my favorite (Olympus OM) lens kit - 24mm, 35mm, 85mm.

    A 35mm and 85mm (or 90mm) pair seems to fit (if you know what I mean).

    Matt

  4. #14
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,882
    Images
    34
    I use 15, 35, 50, 85, and 135 on my screw mount rangefinders. I never miss having one between 35 and 50, but keep lusting after a 25 and a 21 ( and a 12 for that matter, but that's irrelevant to the question at hand. The 40 and the 50 are both basically normal lenses for 35mm, one slightly wide and one slightly long. I'd add a lens that really makes a difference. To me, increasing your field of view by 17 degrees is worth changing lenses, for a ten degree shift, I would just take a few steps. Besides, do you even have a 40mm frameline?

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    N. Calif.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    76
    If you have a 50, all other things being equal, you might want a 35. I use 18, 35, and 50, but will soon be trying a 40, but the 40 will always be on a body seperate from the 18 and 35. 35 and 50 are a big gap for primes, so I can certainly see where eventually you'd want a 35 and a 40, even if the 35 is just hanging on a fixed lens body.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central PA
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    2
    Don't make it so hard on yourself. If you want to try a 40, then get a Summicron-c or M-Rokkor. They are f/2 so you will lose a stop but they are pretty plentiful used. They run about $250.00 and if you don't like it you can always get your money back out and get a 35. I haven't done any verification of this but they are supposed to have better bokeh than the Nokton 40mm.
    Thanks and God Bless,
    Chuck A
    http://www.pbase.com/candrask

    "The photograph isolates and perpetuates a moment of time: an important and revealing moment, or an unimportant and meaningless one, depending upon the photographer's understanding of his subject and mastery of his process." -Edward Weston

    When asked how he felt about missing photographs while he reloaded his camera with film, he replied, "There are no photographs while I'm reloading." -Garry Winogrand

  7. #17
    Markok765's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    24
    I hate wide angles. when i use my 35 i find that i have to move in closer, and i hate it! i can never get close enough. i almost always my 55 or mt 105
    Marko Kovacevic
    Blog
    Youtube

  8. #18
    Sportera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    New Orleans La.
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    933
    Images
    82
    Thanks everyone for the help.

    i just ordered a 35mm Skopar from Camera Quest.

  9. #19
    Curt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,510
    Images
    15
    [COLOR=DarkSlateBlue]I hate wide angles. when i use my 35 i find that i have to move in closer, and i hate it! i can never get close enough. i almost always my 55 or mt 105
    __________________
    Marko Kovacevic

    What does this have to do with the decision to buy a 40mm or 35mm? Some more bullshit from Marko who just interjects anything at anyone at anytime. [/COLOR]

    Sam, what are the price ranges of the two lenses?

    Regards,
    Curt

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    505
    Images
    35
    I'm generally with Marko, I think.

    I find most of the time I prefer the 50mm field of view to almost any other length (on a 35mm camera). The rest of the time I am usually using an 85mm lens.

    I have a couple of fixed lens rangefinders with a 38mm or 40mm lens, which I don't mind.

    However, after using my Fuji GS645S a lot on holiday I have a hankering for a 35mm lens for 35mm RF. In my case that probably means a cheap Jupiter-12 though.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin