Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,219   Posts: 1,532,258   Online: 811
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    140

    classic voigtlander rangefinders. which one?

    OK, I know the Prominent and Vitessa are nice cameras. But a bit on the high side pricewise.

    What about all the other vitos, etc?

    I like Voigtlander and I like a wellbuilt rangefinder. So which one should I buy next?

  2. #2
    Andy K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sunny Southend, England.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    9,422
    Images
    81
    I don't know which one you should buy next. It depends on if you intend using it or if its just going to sit in a collection.

    For use I'd recommend the Vito CLR, I have one and it is a superb user camera.

    For collecting, anything that looks shiny.


    -----------My Flickr-----------
    Anáil nathrach, ortha bháis is beatha, do chéal déanaimh.

  3. #3
    Buster6X6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    London Ontario Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    713
    Images
    43
    Hi Kevin
    I have a Vito II with a Color Skopar lens. A gem of a camera very small and great contrasty lens to boot.

    Greg
    Looking is a gift, but seeing is power.

    Buster6X6

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    140
    hehe, collect the shiny ones and use a CLR or Vito II. gotcha.


    which is the better lens, Lanthar or Skopar? and can I expect a working meter on the CLR? thanks
    Last edited by Kevin Roach; 11-09-2006 at 08:08 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #5
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Roach View Post
    hehe, collect the shiny ones and use a CLR or Vito II. gotcha.


    which is the better lens, Lanthar or Skopar? and can I expect a working meter on the CLR? thanks
    Skopar is usually regarded as better, but there's not a lot in it.

    Working meter - I have a Vito CLR with a working meter, selenium meters seem to last a lot longer if they are kept covered up, so a camera that has been kept in its natty little case (most were) is a better bet than one that has been on display on a shelf.

    Regards,

    David

  6. #6
    tdeming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    40
    Vitomatics were the next level down from the Prominent and Vitessa range, and are excellent cameras. The prontor shutters usually need a CLA for the slow speeds (true also for the Vitos), but these cameras are so solid they will last a long time. IMHO they are much better built, and designed, than the Vito series, but the "CLR" Vitos are similar in features with coupled lightmeter and rangefinder (comparing to the Vitomatic II, as the Vitomatic I lacked the rangefinder). As posted above, the selenium meters are still usable, but might require calibration, especially for artificial light. The later vitomatics used CdS meters, but the batteries are hard to find and the cameras are highly collectable (thus expensive). If you want a slight upgrade on lens speed, try and find a Vitomatic II with the 50/f2 Ultron (same lens as the Vitessa) -but these are usually pricey. I'd avoid the Dynamatics. Although these are wonderful cameras when working, the full automatic features usually find some way to get out of whack. I regularly use a Vitomatic II as well as a (working!) Dynamatic II, both with the color Skopar lenses.

    cheers

    Tim

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Jersey (again)
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,975
    The Vito IIa is a design "improvement" over the Vito II. It uses a top deck similar to the original Vito B. Like the Vito II, it has a coated Color Skopar lens and usually a Prontor shutter.

    Some of the Vito II cameras have a Compur shutter, although you're far more likely to encounter one with a Pronto(r).

    The Vito III is very similar to the Prominent -- essentially it is a lighter weight folding version of the Prominent. However, these are not bargains and often sell for more than the Prominent. These usually have the excellent Ultron lens. I can't remember if Voigtlander put a Septon onto the Vito III.

    I had a Vito CLR and now have a Vitomatic IIb. Both are rangefinder cameras with selenium meters. The CLR is a slightly larger model and very usable. The IIb is smaller -- it's essentialy a second model Vito B (the one with the van albada viewfinder) that has added a meter and rangefinder. As a result, the IIb is much noticeably heavier than the B.

    There is a small translucent dial on the top of the right deck that collects light so the meter needle can be seen inside the viewfinder. It's a nice little camera with many tricks and a coated Color Skopar lens.

    Both the CLR and the IIb have a front-mounted shutter release, which Ivor Mantanle calls correctly "an acquired taste." In the end, you generally tolerate it.

    The IIb has a rewind lever, rather than knob rewind. I don't remember if the CLR, which also has a Color Skopar lens (at least the one I owned had one), has knob rewind.

    I have a short writeup of the Vito III, as well as a couple other Voigtlander cameras on my site. The Prominent is my least favorite.
    Last edited by elekm; 11-11-2006 at 07:17 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1
    The Vito CLR has really ugly bokeh and is very unsharp wide-open. Stopped down, it's not great, but it works. I have the Lanthar model tough, can't say anything about the Skopar, which is rumoured to be better.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    140
    I picked up a Vito II. It's not even a rangefinder but it sure is a sweet little camera. I noticed most voigtlanders are in pretty good shape. People must have taken care of them, showed some pride in their equipment. This one looks new. And it cost me 10 bucks!!

    I'm going for a vitomatic or CLR next.

  10. #10
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by davor View Post
    The Vito CLR has really ugly bokeh and is very unsharp wide-open. Stopped down, it's not great, but it works. I have the Lanthar model tough, can't say anything about the Skopar, which is rumoured to be better.
    If your camera was acquired secondhand and has always delivered poor performance, I would think this indicates damage of some kind (lens misalignment caused by dropping the camera?).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin