Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,302   Posts: 1,536,213   Online: 715
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
  1. #31

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    905
    Wow,
    I have a $8 Mamiya Super Deluxe, does that qualify me for the hallowed "out cheapskate Jim Galli" award? Of course, due to a lifetime of cleaning with a t-shirt or some such by a previous owner, it's great for "period" shooting, and the meter doesn't work, but hey, it was only $8.



    erie

    Quote Originally Posted by MattCarey View Post
    hey Jim,

    I have a $55 Canonnet. I never thought I'd out-cheapskate Jim Galli, but there it is...

    I will say that as a non-rangefinder addict, it has offered me opportunities I couldn't otherwise get. My absolute all-time favorite photographs were taken with this toy. The reason--stealth.

    I had this camera with me when my first son was born (OK, I had it with the second as well). I had fast film and no flash. I was able to take images from 5 feet away where my wife later said, "I didn't know you had a camera then!"

    No flash, quiet shutter. Looks dorky, so it doesn't register as a camera in a lot of people's minds.

    Now, as a point of heresy--the other camera that proved it's value was the digital point-and-shoot. With the first kid, he was in the NICU and my wife was stuck in bed. I was able to take pictures of him and show them to my wife on a laptop. For the second kid, they had free wireless, so I was able to upload images to the family instantly. I think I developed a roll of film from my folder that had images from that visit...oh, a month ago.

    Matt

  2. #32
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,095
    Now for a different perspective on this debate.

    I sold camera's at several stores when I was in college. I came to these conclusions:
    1) Forget about which has the better "image" [what people think, not photographic image]
    2) Which camera feels more comfortable to use - location of the adjustments, shutter release, ... and
    3) The most important issue which camera fits best in your hands.

    Do not under estimate the importance of #3. Forget what everyone else tells you => you are the one carrying and using the camera. A person will very large hands will not be comfortable with an Olympus Pen F no matter how much his friends like it. [Place an example of a person with small hands here]

    Steve

  3. #33
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,242
    Images
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by MattCarey View Post
    hey Jim,

    I have a $55 Canonnet. I never thought I'd out-cheapskate Jim Galli, but there it is...

    Matt
    Ha ha Matt, I have you beat! I just bought a Zorki IV for $30CAD! That also includes the 50mm Jupiter lens. I will be souping the first roll thru it tonight.

    Eric
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    129
    jim, have to handled any voigtlander bessas or zeiss ikons? those are lighter.

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto ON Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    547
    Dan, I too use a Visioflex II. I use it with my CL. Leica had a little known replacement arm so the Visio would work with the CL and the arm would mate with the shutter release on the CL as it was different from the M placement. Sadly, I do not have it so I use a dual release cable to trip both. No, not as easy to use as my Bronica with the extension tubes but as my macro work is not often and I spend quite a bit of time in setting the stage, lighting, etc. it makes no difference. When installed just need to advance the film and set the mirror in 2 steps vs the 1 step for the Bronica. As the CL has the TTL there is also no metering issue. I'm not sure I'd be as comfortable with the setup if using a non-metered body.

    While the slr did away with some of the limitations of a rangefinder, I am still more in awe of how well Leica engineers worked around them. Also, how Leica took the long view of their lens mounts and from their intorduction of the M39 based camera throughout the decades to the current M7 (not sure about the digital M8 and M9 compatibility) their lenses have been usable on their bodies.

  6. #36

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    2,702
    When pros used film cameras (in 60s) most used a Nikon F some carried a rfdr as well (Canon P or Leica M2), wide on rfdr normal or tele on SLR.

    The big advantage of a M is the fast changing mount compared to a Canon VI, P or 7.

    The big advantage of the Canons is the fast film change, loading is a lot quicker. If you are only using one lens the mount advantage is not significant, but reaching the end of a film could be annoying.

    The viewfinder and range finders of Canons and Leicas are different, but that is less significant in good light and with age some of the rangefinder images have faded. So you need to check the one you are buying.

    If you are gonna shoot a lot of film you need a Canon if you are going to juggle lenses a Leica.

    The Canon lenses were good for their day, and you can also now get new LTM lenses. Prices of the Canons have escalated, you used to not be able to give them away, almost. Still cheaper then a Leica.

    Noel

  7. #37
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,401
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155

    Failed

    I had forgotten about this post long ago.

    To satisfy any curiosity I thought I should report that I failed miserably at being a 35mm rangefinder photog. After the Canon I tried both the Konica RF Hexar and the Yashica Electro 35 which I still have 2 beauty's if anyone wants them.

    The Konica was by far the best of the group from my standpoint. Easy, accurate, pretty to hold, well thought out, etc etc.

    The Canon (yes I had an 0.95 50mm for it) was just a '58 Chrysler 300 with Hemi of a camera. Awesome to look at, miserable to use.

    The Electro 35's at the far other end of the spectrum are awesome little best bang ever for the buck machines. Light as a feather and the glass is excellent in every way. A $45 Leica??

    Ultimately, I guess my problem is what do you do with all those pictures. My other problem is 'what pictures???' I guess for me I have a hard enough time finding something I think is worth setting up the 8X10 for, and what would I do with rolls and rolls of pictures and where are all those good pictures anyways. So for me, 35mm is a lot of poor quality pictures of nothing very inspiring. I'm better doing 5 8X10's or 10 4X5's in a weekend of something semi-worthy of photographing.

    Where I live is also in the equation. No street photogs needed. The desert lends itself to large format.

    That's my story and I'm stickin' tuit.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin