|
|
|
-
 Originally Posted by Puma
Noctilux is basically an F/1 lens, there are F/1.2, F/1 and F/0.95 varieties. Noctili are completely unnecessary....
Puma
Noctiluces would be the correct pseudolatinate plural. I rather like my (accusative singular) f1.0 Noctilucem. 
Chris
-
 Originally Posted by Atlo
I second rangefinderforum, lots of leica love over there.
WAY too much wankery over there. Some good info for sure, but it tends to get lost in the more numerous, pointless nerd threads -- "what kind of bicycle does a Leica user ride?". (an actual thread!)
Stop twiddling oneself. Get out and shoot. /rant
-
Colin, once you start looking at 1 in 5 threads there as parody, it makes more sense.
-
 Originally Posted by Brian Legge
Colin, once you start looking at 1 in 5 threads there as parody, it makes more sense. 
I think 20% is too low. It's more like 25%.
OTOH, their are some really decent folks there and.some good info. I don't want ro pan the site. I check it semi regularly. Goodness knows there's enough wacky stuff here too, some of which I'm guilty of participating in.
|
|