Electro 35 G...buy or wait for better?

[BetterSense]

I'm in the position of wanting a rangefinder camera but not being able to afford a leica. I can buy a really mint condition electro 35G with case for $30. This is no leica--it has no manual mode, it has no hot shoe and the film speed only goes up to 500. What's mostly going to annoy me is the lack of manual operation. I'm debating whether to buy it while I can, or wait for something else. I'm not interested in collecting cameras. What are my other options? It's practically impossible to find cheap rangefinder cameras secondhand among the glut of SLRs, and I don't even know what's out there. I just want an easy-to-use coupled rangefinder camera with manual operation and a decent lens.

[HerrBremerhaven]

I sold a couple of black body Yashica GT cameras last year, after not having used them a while. At first they were nice, because the aperture priority allows for easy operation. Then I ended up with a Petri 7S, which I think is a better looking camera. After trying out the Petri 7S, I decided that I like it better, due to being able to set the shutter and aperture. However, the Yashica is built tougher, and has maybe a little better lens than the Petri. Tough choice, but the prices on these are close.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat Photography

[Dave Pritchard]

My Electro G goes up to ASA 1000. I just looked at it. Great lens, f1:1.7. It will set shutter speed out to 30 seconds! What do you want for $30?

If you really need full manual operation, I have two suggestions.

Canon QL17. You can set it off of automatic to get full manual control.

FED2. Yeah, it's Russian roulette, but fully manual. Leica 2 design. Good lenses.

[BetterSense]

My Electro G goes up to ASA 1000

you sure you have a G? Ken rockwell says the G only goes to 500. So does photoethnography.

[Dave Pritchard]

I think this is a terminology difference.

Karen Nakamura shows the ASA film rating from 25 to 1000.
Aperture from f16 to f1.7.
Shutter speed from 30 seconds to 1/500.

This matches the settings on my Electro 35 G.

[Leighgion]

I don't know enough about the Electro models to comment on them, but I can say the Canon QL17 is worth a look for you. I've got one and it's great when the occasion calls for a compact, capable RF.

QL17 has shutter priority mode, but can run full manual as well. The 40mm f1.7 is a good lens, it has a hot shoe, sync port and ISO goes up to 800. Metering is not TTL, but the metering cell is right above the lens and covered if you use filters, so no need to dial in filter compensation. Body is a solid block of metal.

Main downsides are that the meter shuts off completely if you go into manual mode so no help from it then, uses those outlawed mercury cells (but as usual works well enough with silver oxide substitutes) and its 48mm filter/cap size is a bit harder to shop for.

Stuff I shot with my QL17: http://www.flickr.com/photos/leighgion/tags/ql17/

[Anscojohn]

At that price, what's to lose? I sold many of those cameras. They are o.k., with all the negatives already pointed out. A bit bulky, tho. Is the difference in ASA number perhaps a difference between a G and a GN? One thing, though, that big long mercury cell might be hard to find nowadays--although they last "forever" if you do not make an huge number of 30 second exposures.
I have a Canonet GIII which I love; and a Fed 3 I love even more, because it needs me! Both cut a sharp image. The GIII still works (sans metering) without a battery.

[Michael W]

I was interested in an Electro until I held one, it was much bigger and heavier than I'd expected, along with the lack of manual functions, I lost interest.
Olympus SP is a good camera, small, excellent lens, manual exposure, uncoupled meter can be a bit fiddly. Takes mercury batteries but you can use the cheap modern hearing aid batteries instead. Not sure if they sell as cheap as $30 though.

[Jeff Kubach]

I have a Electro 35G which I got for free several years ago. Despite it's lack of manual functions, I still like the camera and does take great pictures.

Jeff

[2F/2F]

I'd recommend one for sure, but I think $30 sounds high, even for a very nice one.

Best (or "most controlled", rather) way to use these manually is with a flash. '30 is fixed, you choose your aperture, and change your flash power to suit.