Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,338   Posts: 1,537,624   Online: 1002
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    JPD
    JPD is offline
    JPD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    769

    Retina lenses compared

    I wondered how my two Retina IIc cameras with Xenon and Heligon compared, and if their accessory tele and wide lenses are usable, so I took some test shots on Efke 25. I had half the roll left, so I also tested a Ib with 2,8 Xenar and a pre-war IIa with 2,8 Xenon (the five element Xenar type, very different from the post-war double gauss Xenon). Nothing scientific, but I got the results I wanted and scanned the negs. The only sharpening is flickrs own when the pictures were automatically rezised.

    Full frames:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1094/...5f21434c_b.jpg

    IIc Xenon and Heligon 2,8/50:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1338/...ca4c6a45_b.jpg

    Again:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1244/...33630c1a_b.jpg

    Curtar-Xenon and Heligon C 5,6/35:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1035/...46cf0405_b.jpg

    Longar-Xenon and Heligon C 4/80:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1331/...ff792aa6_b.jpg

    Ib Xenar and pre-war IIa Xenon 2,8/50:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1115/...454e968a_b.jpg

    Ib Xenar and IIc Xenon 2,8/50 Edge:
    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1110/...8a0d9074_b.jpg

    The largest aperture I used was 4, because it gave 1/500 and I didn't want to overexpose. I could have taken the shots indoors using a test chart or newspapers with finely printed text, but it would have been too boring...
    J. Patric Dahlén

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    580
    How about the Schneider-Krauznach 2.0/50 of the IIIc?

  3. #3
    JPD
    JPD is offline
    JPD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by Pumalite View Post
    How about the Schneider-Krauznach 2.0/50 of the IIIc?
    I don't have any Retinas with the 2,0 lenses at the moment.
    J. Patric Dahlén

  4. #4
    vedmak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    313
    when you said "compared" what exactly are you looking for in the lens? Resolution, contrast, bokeh? I would take a good bokeh lens over the sharp one.

  5. #5
    JPD
    JPD is offline
    JPD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by vedmak View Post
    when you said "compared" what exactly are you looking for in the lens? Resolution, contrast, bokeh? I would take a good bokeh lens over the sharp one.
    "Sharpness" only, because I didn't focus on anything close, and the negs are scanned on a flatbed with automatic "this and that" that affect the contrast.

    I told you this wasn't a "scientific test". I had a roll of KB25 and wanted to see if the accessory tele and wide lenses were usable, and if the Heligon really was sharper than the Xenon. This was also the first time I used my pre-war IIa. I didn't think about testing the bokeh! Maybe I should! I have only used Retinas for everyday photography, like the family around the christmas table, dad with his new car, mother rolling meatballs... I use larger formats for bokeh.
    J. Patric Dahlén

  6. #6
    BobD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    California, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    437
    Interesting test -- thanks for posting.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin