Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,713   Posts: 1,483,015   Online: 695
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    msbarnes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    374
    Images
    7

    Bessa T vs Bessa R

    How do these compare in terms of durability/feel? Some people find the Bessa's to feel cheap/plastically while others do not, but it seems that the R2/R3/R4 cameras have a better feel. So I'm wondering, is the T built better than the R?

    I've handled none of these cameras, so I'm not sure what to expect. I have a Canon P and it feels real nice, but the focusing is a bit difficult, so I'd like to accompany it with a Bessa.

    Also, how do the patches compare?
    Last edited by msbarnes; 10-12-2011 at 11:46 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2
    guitstik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Eads TN.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,098
    Images
    66
    I have a Bessa R and compared to my Nikon S2 it feels really light and maneuverable. All of the Bessas are built well the only differences are the mounts they use and a few features. The L is LTM and has no RF, the R is also an LTM but has the RF, bothhave TTL as far as the other models, all inknow is that they have different mounts, either Cosina, LTM or M. Check out kenrockwell.com for more info.
    Thy heart -- thy heart! -- I wake and sigh,
    And sleep to dream till day
    Of the truth that gold can never buy
    Of the bawbles that it may.

    www.silverhalidephotography.com

  3. #3
    Rom
    Rom is offline
    Rom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Lyon - France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    131
    Images
    2
    I have a bessa R3a and i do not feel it plastically at all...

    Seems to be strong and very confortable to carry.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,081
    Images
    21
    I have an R and an L and have handled a T briefly. As far as I can tell they're all built on the exact same chassis.

    Everyone seems to agree that the build quality got better starting with the R2 family, but I've never had a problem with the feel of the old "plasticky" ones. I mean, I don't use them to drive in nails or anything, but they feel like perfectly reasonable cameras to me.

    -NT
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    251
    I have an L and a T: bought the T to use my summicron on so I don't scratch the!&@"*** out of my M3. I bought the L because it was $99. I feel a difference in quality : doesn't affect the pictures.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hollywood, FLA USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    23
    I have a Bessa T and the Epson R-D1 (digital rangefinder build on Bessa R). The different between the two are the light meter and viewfinder. The T only has a center spot view/rangefinder. And the light meter is only a red/green/red light system. The R style body has a full viewfinder and light meter displays the shutter speed in the viewfinder.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pasadena
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,646
    The T is built a little better than the R. They are both well made cameras however. The R is more convenient to use since it has built in finders.

  8. #8
    gb hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    49
    I have both the R & a bessa L. Haven't held a T. I can say they are light compared to a Bessa R2m which I have held. I keep both camera's in their cases & I don't have any problem with them. MOF I enjoy carrying one of them about everwhere I travel. The finders are superb.

  9. #9
    tony lockerbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bega N.S.W. Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,256
    Images
    366
    The later R2 etc have a more substantial feel for sure, buy basically the same camera underneath. They are all a bit cheap and cheerful compared to a M Leica, but of course they are cheap and cheerful!
    The thing is that the R and the L and T all work really well, excellent metering and nice bright and contrasty viewfinder (in the R that is).
    At the price point, the cameras and most definitely, the lenses, all perform well above their weight. Great intro into RF photography, with the SM cameras being much cheaper to buy these days.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    6
    Remember that some C/V Bessas are M-mount and others are LTM, make sure you get what you want for a mount.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin