Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,821   Posts: 1,581,858   Online: 1091

Linux Desktop Users

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
  1. IdahoPhotoist
    I have tried quite a few Linux distros, Liked Suse till Novell got their hands on it and played kissy huggie with M$, I then went to Ubuntu was pretty satisfied with it, though I didn't care for the Brave New World politics of its founder. But also got frustrated with the constant update game, and when their wireless driver for my Dell laptop was dropped and I couldn't get it to work, I dropped Ubuntu.,.. Presently I am using Mepis 6.5, I like it... and wireless works.
    As for Joomla, don't know I tried wrapping my head around "Drupal" after some classes in it I decided to go back to my darkroom where I belong...
  2. Eric Rose
    Eric Rose
    Wow I guess we Linux users must be a happy bunch. Not much activity here. I am currently using Ubuntu netbook version on my HP Mini. Works like a charm and gives me full horsepower from the tiny Atom processor. I mainly use this netbook for quick update from the couch or for traveling. I don't bother to try and do any image editing on my Mini as the Linux programs for RAW files are pretty mickey mouse. One nice thing is that my Mini fits quite nicely into my camera bag. Great for a quick download from the D700.

    If anyone has any really good RAW programs that run on Ubuntu let me know. Must support Nikon NEF files.
  3. phenix
    phenix
    Two years later (since my previous post here) I've got to use Ubuntu on a double Turion HP, have installed Puppy 431 on a USB key just in case I'll need it, and will soon install the same Puppy on my old IBM PII-266MHz & 64MB Ram (tried it Live-CD and works). From the Puppies, I liked most the Wolf's desktop, but didn't work with the PII.
    It took me so long, because there are so many releases and absolutely no help - everybody say the same thing: try as many you can and chose by yourself the flavor you like - Thanks, but...! This is why I would like to share here the key issues helping me to make a choice:
    1) I think the most important is to decide what desktop you like: mainly Gnome or KDE, but also the other more on the light side desktops. In this respect downloading a big release (only one, no matter which) with all its desktops seems the first step to make. Try the Live-CDs and decide what are you fine with.
    2) After choosing the preferred desktop, it's time to decide between a rolling release and a long term one (LT). The LT should be a better choice because, if you take 2-3 weeks of vacation and do not update your Linux in between, when you return the update and possibly the upgrade are smooth (at least with Ubuntu was so). In the same conditions, but with a rolling release, you might be roasted - using Sabayon, the most beautiful Linux I've ever seen, but a rolling release, after 3 weeks of not updating/upgrading it, when I finally did it, I've lost all my desktop (task bars, icons, settings, all). Fortunately I could backup my documents using the right button of the mouse on the empty desktop - the only way to open a location on the broken system and to copy it on a USB key. This is also why for my old PII and my USB key, I choose Puppy over AntiX. For me LT is a must, not a choice.
    3) With these, the choices narrow down to very few releases (2-3). Try them on Live-CD, possibly install them next to Windows (double boot), and if you don't like one, install another over it - very easy to install on the same partition created by the old one. As for the choice, I would say that the main criterion is the availability of programs you need. Some know exactly what they need, some other just need time to discover the new possibilities Linux offers them, and get used with the very wide range of free (of money and spam) applications, compared to the very narrow one Windows offers with lot of spam and for lot of $$$. Hobbyists will find their Paradise. Moreover, installing and uninstalling apps in Linux do not leave traces like in Windows, so trial is almost unlimited.
    All these, most of you know already, but new Linux users don't, like I didn't 2 years ago. And I hope this will help them to save lot of time when choosing the release the most appropriate for them. To me it took a year and a half - much to much, and in between I completely neglected my darkroom! So, if I wouldn't have hate Windows so much, I would have given away the Linux trial after only 2 weeks, so difficult was to chose over such a large diversity and without any criterion or landmark. So, I hope what I wrote here will be useful for some newcomers to Linux.
    Best regards!
  4. Truzi
    Truzi
    Played a bit with Gnu Linux in the late ninties, but went all the way around 2002.

    I've toyed with different distros, but my Favorite is Debian. The Gnome3 fiasco is the only problem I've had, and I always use Debian Testing. I'm now happily on XFCE, which has improved a lot over the years.
Results 61 to 64 of 64
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin