a BIG W T F
a BIG W T F
I wonder how many people there are who have been entering this contest for years with their Nikon produced film images are now barred from continuing to do so?
It seems a silly rule.
Limiting submissions to 35mm full frame or smaller sensors/film might make a little more sense, but would still exclude those shooting Nikkor medium format or large format lenses.
Should I video tape the smashing of my D80 by my F4 and put it on youtube?!@
As far as the contest, I agree it's unfair of them to disclude film, perhaps they didn't want to have to deal with vetting a film image and decided it was time to just go digital only for cost and ease reasons? Plus they want to support their current product, it's been what, 10 years since a pro film camera from Canon or Nikon? They are just being business forward, why supports a medium they don't support, I don't like it, but it's the reality, it's just like how the painters reacted when photography was new, portrait painters freaked out and chastised film portraits claiming it wasn't real art etc. so, we have to accept that this is a medium of the past.
The Important Ones - Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1 / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Someone need to start a petition on Change.org
No I am still not over it, how about we all shoot film and edit the EXIF to be a Nikon DSLR and win it, and then show everyone the neg.
I don't understand this. What's to vet?Quote:
As far as the contest, I agree it's unfair of them to disclude film, perhaps they didn't want to have to deal with vetting a film image and decided it was time to just go digital only for cost and ease reasons?
Make it clear stolen (or "borrowed") images will lead to disqualification. Or run all the finalist images through something like tineye. EXIF can be faked so that's no guarantee. And to exclude the work of some photographers for ease or cost reasons? To deny people a chance because they don't want to go to some trouble or to save money is unethical.
They allowed and still allow medium and large formats in which they have no product; they no longer make large format lenses. They allow images from any make of camera or lens. What will hurt them more, an image taken with a Canon 40D with kit lens, or an image taken with a 105mm Nikkor on an F2? At least the Nikon equipment would serve as a demonstration of the quality of Nikon products through the years. The Canon gets them nothing.Quote:
They are just being business forward, why supports a medium they don't support,
I don't see the connection. There's no gripe about digital; it's about the exclusion of analog.Quote:
I don't like it, but it's the reality, it's just like how the painters reacted when photography was new, portrait painters freaked out and chastised film portraits claiming it wasn't real art etc.
It is a medium of the past. Over 150 years of iconic images bear witness to its ability to reach people of all stations in life.Quote:
so, we have to accept that this is a medium of the past.
It is also a medium of the present. Film is still being made, and is being used by people with the drive and determination to realize their vision through it.
It is also a medium of the future, so long as there are companies making film, and beyond that people making their own emulsions and carbons and gum prints, just as some do now. That artistry should not be ignored.
It is not much different from painting, really. Except that successful painters receive much more money for their work.
Painting was the medium of the past, it is a highly valued art form of the present, and it will continue to be in the future, even if painters have to grind their own pigments and mix their own paints. I know one who does that now, to get what he wants.