Maybe they'll make Perez's exit a requirement for the deal.
Printable View
Maybe they'll make Perez's exit a requirement for the deal.
I suppose it's reasonable for the head of a large company to have his own entrance and exit!Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Cole
Steve.
Heh heh...now that's funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Cole
I don't know why they would keep Perez.
What has he done to make anyone want to keep him? He's ridden along with the company as it spiraled down into bankruptcy, for most of that time assuring everyone that the company was ready to turn around. So why would anyone put faith in anything he says? I mean, looking at it rationally, not emotionally: is he the guy to trust now? If I were a potential investor I would not be inclined to put my faith in him.
I am really baffled as to why he has lasted this long.
Oh, well. What do I know? I'm just a guy who always had to perform well in my job to keep it.
Probably someone would because "you push the button and they do the rest". Depends on tastes :)Quote:
Originally Posted by RattyMouse
maybe ilford will buy them out, i personally trust that ilford will last the longest of the three anyways.
Maybe they cannot afford his severance package.
Screw the severance package. "We'll pay you 10 bazillion dollars for this operation provided you fire Perez, kick him in the butt on his way out the door, and...."
Maybe he'll buy Kodak with his severance package. Then it will all work out.
This seems like a far more important story to film photographers than any news or rumors of Kodak.
http://www.harmantechnology.com/Blog...=60&EntryID=71