i agree :)
Printable View
I don't care what anyone says-I've never had it better.I'm paying less for film now than I did in the 90's.Equipment has become affordable-I've got all kinds of equipment now that I could only wish I had back then,and I can read and learn about printing and processing online,whereas before I was on my own.Let's enjoy it!
The more I read about it the more likely those years become. Seems photography was pretty big around 1910 with the Kodak cameras. It's just that the 50s the 60s 70s 80s sales must have doubled many many many times in that period right? Still hard to fathom that 10% of 2000 sales might be the amount of film sold in those early days...
i don't know ...
there were a ton of movies made back in the early days :)
does movie film count ?
http://www.filmsite.org/pre20sintro.html
I believe the biggest year for film sales was actually 1989 :
You cannot compare the state of the market, as AGX says, before then everyone was growing after that everyone was declining, also we ( HARMAN ) look only at monochrome which was always 'tiny' by volume compared to the colour 35mm market.
Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
The Ilford management should have been an example to AGFA and Kodak. (Maybe that is generalization but all the intentions at Ilford seem toward a healthy film market, even if this means a lot smaller.)
And yes in a way this still is a golden film time, don't forget PanF Rudeofus;)
Well, Agfa got rid of their consumer film division, Kodak not. Look now who is the more successful company...Quote:
The Ilford management should have been an example to AGFA and Kodak.
Though the question remains how they got rid of that division.