Originally Posted by RattyMouse
Market share doesn't mean squat in a market that is shrinking. And GM's market share was high, but their losses were higher.
Kodak is saddled with the expectations of the holders of what was once a huge market capitalization.
The directors of Kodak are/were required by law to try to replace the profit stream that was film with something similarly profitable. Film will never be that big again.
I believe that film can be a profitable and healthy industry, but I think that Kodak wasted its chance to be a major part of that industry. If they had downsized several years ago, and then used their resources to build other, parallel streams of profits, things would be different.
Remember that it took an insolvency and what was essentially a re-start from almost the beginning to make Ilford the small but apparently successful entity that it is now.
And Ilford remains far, far smaller than Kodak's film and paper business is today.
If Kodak can manufacture all its film sales in one day , it makes its bigger 400 times they can sell If the film sales dropped 1/10 , it makes Kodak was 40 times bigger than it can sell 30 years ago. Am I wrong somewhere ? I think we did not count movie industry. It makes movie industry was consuming lots of film 30 years ago.
Kodak is NOT required by law to replace lost profits. The law cannot require either the impossible nor the stupid. The law at best requires the board of directors to follow the best interests of the ownership. If the ownership wants massive profits, then they follow that. If the ownership wants to stay a film company, then they could have downsized. Used the billions of dollars in capital that they had at one time and shrank to what would have been a more sustainable company.
In a way this is very positive: Kodak films could be saved. But reading the other posts I realize there are more forces, like shareholders, involved. Still a shame the right people didn't see this at the right time to save E6...
Originally Posted by kb3lms
Unfortunately, Kodak is saddled with an idiot at the top, who probably hired, promoted other idiots that agreed with him. It is amazing that he is still there.
Bad management seems to be their problem since the mid 80s, they basically invented the digital camera, developed stunning megapixel sensors before its competition and they completely missed the boat.
Originally Posted by fotch
Inventing something with few newly developed integrated circuits and to produce millions of canon dslrs are completely different things.
thats cause they spent a lot of time keeping all their analog / traditional film based customers
Originally Posted by Quinten
instead of dumping us and going full steam ahead into the bright new future which we are all grateful for.
so, in a way their problem is because of us ... hosue could kodak dump the film based history they entrenched themselves in ?
not to mention, when you are used to cooking for 300 million, its very hard to cook for 10 millon / an empty nest
without getting rid of your kitchen and cookware and ... .. ( its like making ramen noodles in a 20 gallon pot . )