That's what I meant with those `trendy´ subgroups.
I do not doubt the quality of Agfa's papers. And I appreciate the risk of the entrepeneur you took by trying to re-make these papers. (There are so many people here at Apug whining about products disappearing, but few to take initiatives...)
But time goes on, why reinventing the wheel? (I must admit though, through my historic interest I am looking back a lot of time myself...)