Thanks for the contribution and link Bjorke, an interesting read for sure.
Marty
Printable View
Thanks for the contribution and link Bjorke, an interesting read for sure.
Marty
Learning the rules of composition then applying them to capture the drama and power of a scene just as Rembrandt painted his masterpieces or Henri Cartier-Bresson captured his images with excellent composition to create powerful and meaning full images. It is now just about popping the shutter and hyping that something will appear.
Speak for yourself!Quote:
Originally Posted by kjsphoto
Funny how some hypeful poppers sure seem to get a lot more good pix than others.
That was a typo, it was suppose to be;
It is not just about popping the shutter and hoping that something will appear.
NOT
It is now. Man I hate typing...
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjsphoto
Seems to me some people can type and other people can take photographs in either colour or black and white.
I'm glad kjsphoto to say you fall into the "take photographs" category.
Maybe a loupe to examine your screen :)
I find street photography to be a deceptively difficult area of picture making, and I mean in both excution and definition, as well as criteria for judging it. It is a subjective thing in many ways - but lets not use that as an easy way out (no here has, so far).
It (street shooting) is dotted with traps and pitfalls - from actual, present danger to ones person, through those threatening the artistic integrity. The line between documentation and exploitation. The often seen lack of that all important compassion. Hell, the pictures that are not meant to be compassionate - is a condemning image a bad street photo? There are things out there, everywhere, deserving nothing but contempt, too!
On the other hand, I have seen so many takes on street photography, so far ranging in their unique apporach, that I believe the lack of exploitation and ability to contain meaning into the image which is technically competent are the only two absolute must-have's.
Peter.
http://www4.hmc.edu:8001/humanities/...oyWithWine.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by gnashings
Out-of-focus, probably underexposed, cloyingly exploitative and cute.
There are no must-haves, their continual reinvention is crucial to the nature of SP
Thank you for posting this, Kevin... one of the all time great street photographs ever made... and an extraodinary record of the way people (and children) lived.Quote:
Originally Posted by bjorke
I mean... you just don't see kids these days carrying two bottles of wine home from the store, anymore... at least not around here!! :D
And it shows a great sense of humour!
Bjorke,
I agree, it leaves something to be desired in terms of sharpness - but I still think it fits my description: it was as good as it could have been for the great master to manage to capture it just exactly like that. And I do NOT see the exploitation of the subject by the photographer at all. Sure, there are not musts - let me rephrase it then: I do not enjoy images that cross those boundries. For me then, its a must have. And I would say that it is my personal stance on it that photographers should NEVER exploit.
You do what you will.
Peter.
wonderful story Ricardo, thanks for posting it, I enjoyed reading it. Rapport is very very important I agree!
www.gerryyaum.com
www.gerryyaum.blogspot.com