Quote Originally Posted by Sal Santamaura View Post
...Otherwise, only his print exposure times will increase...
Quote Originally Posted by c6h6o3 View Post
Yeah, but isn't that what he wants? I think his original complaint was that the times he had to use were too short to give adequate control.
Indeed, but, as post #20 indicated, in my experience a much lower level of print exposure illumination is appropriate. If the negatives are somewhat thin but still off the toe, why change anything about their exposure and development? Simply using a low wattage bulb for printing seems more straightforward.