I think his work is truly interesting. From a more technical end I wonder why he seems to never use depth of field (everything is always in focus) or why he tends to put his subjects smack dab in the middle -- I have my own ideas, but like to hear it from him. FWIW To call him kinkaid is laughable, to say he might be too deliberate, lacks nuance might be true, but I think that the deliberateness is part of what he is saying. One other thing about his work is the packaging/presentation. I would think that it would be a natural to present it as discarded snaps, postcards, clippings from a home and garden mag -- common mundane source/presentation -- more than 40"x60"s. Is the size a market thing or a message? Everything I have seen on display is huge -- which to me takes away from the message.