This smacks of the dreaded competition. How is the work selected? If it is one judge as suggested above, the only potentially sensible comparitive evaluation of submissions would be on the basis of print quality. If on the other hand selection is some giant democratic process, that would be way worse as selection would be based on either the most universally popular styles/subject matter, a personal popularity contest, or a showcase if the "in" thing and alternative processes, all to the possible/likely exclusion of superb (aesthetically and technically) work. Good luck.