Thanks for the link. I had no idea that this wasn't a digital capture (after all, what else to expect in the case of Jobs?).
As much as Jobs may have liked this portrait, I always felt that there was something wrong with the presence of the hand. Almost as if it were somebody else's and/or added later. It seems too big, too prominent, too much not-his.
As far as the intensity in the eyes goes- yes, that's recorded quite brilliantly. No wonder Jobs was happy with it.