I'm sure your feedback came back as positive as you mentioned, that's because it's a good paper. But I'm also sure the photographers that you contacted to do the tests and evaluation being the elite--no pejorative connotation intended--might have had a self-selecting bias toward a specific kind of paper, and this one paper might have fallen into that bias. Now that you have a bigger sample of people to draw from, you're probably getting feedback more in keeping with the bias of the rest of us mortals, and perhaps the real market ;-) . Again, the paper is fantastic, that's just one of its characteristics.
Last edited by squinonescolon; 12-07-2011 at 09:43 AM. Click to view previous post history.