Agreed with all the views expressed here. I didn't mean to stir up a hornet's nest, and I'm not familiar at all with Anne's work. After posting this up here, I took a look at some of her earlier work and yes, they do seem to be altered digitally to quite an extent. Much like Gregory Crewdson's work, then. I shared this article because for me it's interesting to see a pro who used to work only with film now going digital. Anyway, agreed with everyone here, the device used to make the photo doesn't matter (much!), but the output does. If it's crap, it's still matter if it's digital crap or 'analog' crap. It still smells