I guess my opinion differs from most in that I find her work very good but lacking in the vision and uniqueness of the famous names she is sometimes compared to. I feel that her work almost entirely lacks the magic that catapulted these people from being 'very good' to icons. Its lovely work, for sure, but does not progress any further for me. I dont think she will be remembered as an Arbus or HCB, but will stand corrected when and if she is!
we are seeing here work now... keep in mind she was a predecessor or a contemporary of many of those we revere today as great... what would her impact have been were she known, her work exhibited, and thus honored today?