Quote Originally Posted by Bill Burk View Post
Saw this again today and right about the time I was going to say - no don't develop to 1.2 - I realized you are supposed to overrun by about 0.1

Guess why? I'm thinking flare again.
I think enlarger flare is going to take that 0.15 off the negative density range and leave you with 1.05 on the paper.
Flare does play a factor in printing, but I believe the LER to negative density range is off set by the Callier coefficient.

The answer is flare, but it's still the camera flare. The short answer is:

2.10*0.56 = 1.17
2.10*0.58 = 1.22

2.20*0.56 = 1.23
2.20*0.58 = 1.28