Originally Posted by zumbido
Coming out with "fim is superior to digifail" makes all film users out to be reactionary Luddite cranks.
Saying that all photography is good, but "yoo may want to try this hand-crafted, old school photography" is a winning sales pitch.
The vast majority of film users acquired through evangelizing will not be in the darkroom anyways because most people haven't the time, money, or space for one. They'll get a mail-order lab to do it, and it will inevitably be scanned. So discrediting digital when scanning will be a key component of promoting film is inherently counter-productive.