Unfortunately this is the truth -- both in his own days and today. The issue never was with nude photography. Lots of people legitimately did it, and still do it, even with young children. The issue was his OTHER activities associated with young girls. I think it is called "grooming" today. And it was just as creepy then as it is now.
Originally Posted by Two23
But history has not shown that he ever violated the trust he had with the children or their parents... and I agree that nobody should assume ill-will without some new-found historical evidence. Assumption and conjecture isn't enough.
Last edited by BrianShaw; 02-22-2012 at 09:50 AM. Click to view previous post history.
Reason: added last thought.