• 08-16-2012 05:40 PM #0
    Poisson Du Jour
    Poisson Du Jour is offline
    Poisson Du Jour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Democratic People's Republic of Highton, Victoria, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,825
    Send a message via AIM to Poisson Du Jour
    Pipyr: With all due respect to individual prevailing circumstances, I would not buy a Pentax 67 or (earlier) 6x7 with a lens for $200! Even a well used slightly battered one with a good lens but fully functional like the 105mm f2.4 costs around $1,100 (with TTL meter, 67 version). Anything with severe dents, scrapes, cracks, or inconsistent operation should be avoided. These cameras have been well-worked, often heavily and thrashed about in their pro lives and failure in a later life is often catastrophic. The bodies are difficult to get parts for: 67 shutters, shutter brakes, mirror dampers and brakes, mirrors, winding gears (the winding knob is a known potential weak spot) TTL meter coupling chains ... all ceased production many years ago. Parts have to be scavenged from other 67 or 6x7 bodies. They are truly dinosaurs of medium format but beautiful ones at that, and pre-loved, looked after specimens will have many years of faithful service left in them. So... Find a reasonably well cared-for specimen and hang the budget. Remember the simple rule of economics that forbids paying a little and getting a lot!
    Last edited by Poisson Du Jour; 08-16-2012 at 05:53 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    .::Garyh
    ♦
    Canon EOS1N ('Brutus', 1993—), TS-E 24mm f3.5L, 20mm f2.8, 17-40 f4L, 70-200 f2.8L
    Pentax 67 ('Pentaximus', 2010—) + SMCP 45mm f4, 55mm f4 & 165mm f4LS;
    Zero Image 6x9 multi-format pinhole (2008—); Sekonic L758D;
    Olympus XA, Nikon Coolpix P7700

    "If you're not having fun, then you're not doing it right!"

    ♦




    Advanced reply Adv Reply