Kodak's assets are being undervalued, largely because the popular culture has fallen in love with all things digital. Witness the swoon over Apple products and the respect shown to Bill Gates. But what they've done is very much the same as Kodak's accomplishments: they have developed a huge bank of technological inventions which support the production of new, high quality consumer products. In the popular mind Kodak is viewed as the "telegraph" to digital photography's new-fangled "telephone". So the powers that be consign chemical imaging to the ash heap of history. But this is only because no one sees the chemistry involved in producing a digital image. Digital cameras are just glorified Autochromes which use a silicon light sensor instead of a silver emulsion. The photo-lithography used to produce both the screen that captures the image and the screen which displays it is well within the skill of an old school photo engineer; it is just a paradigm shift to think in terms of electrons moving through circuits, rather than electrons being transferred to molecules and producing oxidation products.